» Articles » PMID: 35009400

Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Post-Extractive Sites Filled with a New Bone Substitute with or Without Autologous Plate Concentrates: One-Year Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jan 11
PMID 35009400
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the histological and histomorphometric characteristics of post-extraction sites grafted with decellularized bovine compact bone from bovine femur, mixed and unmixed with leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin after four months of healing. This study was designed as a randomized controlled trial of parallel groups. Patients in need of a single, implant-supported restoration to replace a hopeless tooth were recruited for tooth extraction and implant placement four months after socket preservation procedure. After tooth extraction, patients were randomly allocated to receive decellularized bovine compact bone from bovine femur, mixed and unmixed with leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin. After four months of healing, tapered implants were inserted with an insertion torque between 35 and 45 Ncm. Two months later, implants were loaded with screw-retained definitive crowns. Outcome measures were implant (ISR) and prosthesis (PSR) survival rates, complications, histological and histomorphometric analyses, radiographic marginal bone-level changes, and patients' satisfaction. Clinical data were collected up to one year after tooth extraction and socket preservation procedures. Thirty patients were consecutively enrolled in the trial (15 in each group). Unfortunately, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, bone samples were collected only in 19 patients. Two implants failed before definitive prosthesis delivery (ISR 93.3%). No prosthesis failed (PSR 100%). Three complications were experienced in the control group. The mean bone percentage was 40.64 ± 18.76 in the test group and 33.40 ± 22.38 in the control group. The difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.4846). The mean soft tissue percentage was 32.55 ± 19.45 in the test group and 55.23 ± 17.64 in the control group. The difference was statistically significant ( = 0.0235). The mean residual graft was 24.59 ± 18.39 in the test group and 11.37 ± 12.12 in the control group. The difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.0992). Mean marginal bone loss, as well as patient satisfaction, showed no differences between groups. With the limitations of the present study, socket preservation with L-PRF mixed with decellularized bovine compact bone demonstrated favorable results, comparing with decellularized bovine compact bone from bovine femur alone. Further studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these preliminary results.

Citing Articles

Low-Speed Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane in Conjunction With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (DFDBA) Compared to Collagen Membrane With DFDBA in Noncontained Intraosseous Defects of Stage III Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical....

Almoliky N, Hosny M, Elbattawy W, Fawzy El-Sayed K Int J Dent. 2025; 2025:6393105.

PMID: 40028653 PMC: 11872290. DOI: 10.1155/ijod/6393105.


Comparison of Histological, Clinical, and Radiographic Outcomes of Postextraction Ridge Preservation by Allogenic Bone Grafting With and Without Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Talebi Ardakani M, Rezaei Esfahrood Z, Mashhadiabbas F, Hatami M Int J Dent. 2024; 2024:8850664.

PMID: 39483789 PMC: 11527539. DOI: 10.1155/2024/8850664.


Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of α-Calcium Sulfate Hemihydrate in Socket Preservation: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ruslin M, Hamrun N, Tajrin A, Yusuf A, Nurrahma R, Natsir-Kalla D JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e49922.

PMID: 39028555 PMC: 11297378. DOI: 10.2196/49922.


Application of Fibrin Associated with Photobiomodulation as a Promising Strategy to Improve Regeneration in Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Review.

Reis C, Buchaim D, Ortiz A, Fideles S, Dias J, Miglino M Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(15).

PMID: 35956667 PMC: 9370794. DOI: 10.3390/polym14153150.

References
1.
Rosenquist B . A comparison of various methods of soft tissue management following the immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12(1):43-51. View

2.
Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A . Influence of thin mucosal tissues on crestal bone stability around implants with platform switching: a 1-year pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68(9):2272-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.08.018. View

3.
Horvath A, Mardas N, Mezzomo L, Needleman I, Donos N . Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 17(2):341-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0758-5. View

4.
Barootchi S, Wang H, Ravida A, Ben Amor F, Riccitiello F, Rengo C . Ridge preservation techniques to avoid invasive bone reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Naples Consensus Report Working Group C. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019; 12(4):399-416. View

5.
Meloni S, Jovanovic S, Urban I, Baldoni E, Pisano M, Tallarico M . Horizontal ridge augmentation using GBR with a native collagen membrane and 1:1 ratio of particulate xenograft and autologous bone: A 3-year after final loading prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21(4):669-677. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12808. View