» Articles » PMID: 35001437

Developing a Predictive Model for Spinal Shock in Dogs with Spinal Cord Injury

Abstract

Background: Reduced pelvic limb reflexes in dogs with spinal cord injury typically suggests a lesion of the L4-S3 spinal cord segments. However, pelvic limb reflexes might also be reduced in dogs with a T3-L3 myelopathy and concurrent spinal shock.

Hypothesis/objectives: We hypothesized that statistical models could be used to identify clinical variables associated with spinal shock in dogs with spinal cord injuries.

Animals: Cohort of 59 dogs with T3-L3 myelopathies and spinal shock and 13 dogs with L4-S3 myelopathies.

Methods: Data used for this study were prospectively entered by partner institutions into the International Canine Spinal Cord Injury observational registry between October 2016 and July 2019. Univariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between independent variables and the presence of spinal shock. Independent variables were selected for inclusion in a multivariable logistic regression model if they had a significant effect (P ≤ .1) on the odds of spinal shock in univariable logistic regression.

Results: The final multivariable model included the natural log of weight (kg), the natural log of duration of clinical signs (hours), severity (paresis vs paraplegia), and pelvic limb tone (normal vs decreased/absent). The odds of spinal shock decreased with increasing weight (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, P = .09; confidence interval [CI] 0.07-1.2), increasing duration (OR = 0.44, P = .02; CI 0.21-0.9), decreased pelvic limb tone (OR = 0.04, P = .003; CI 0.01-0.36), and increased in the presence of paraplegia (OR = 7.87, P = .04; CI 1.1-56.62).

Conclusions And Clinical Importance: A formula, as developed by the present study and after external validation, could be useful for assisting clinicians in determining the likelihood of spinal shock in various clinical scenarios and aid in diagnostic planning.

Citing Articles

Outcome in paraplegic dogs with or without pain perception due to thoracolumbar fibrocartilaginous embolic myelopathy or acute non-compressive nucleus pulposus extrusion.

Togawa G, Lewis M, Devathasan D Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1406843.

PMID: 38784658 PMC: 11111901. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1406843.


Prevalence, MRI findings, and clinical features of lumbosacral intervertebral disc protrusion in French Bulldogs diagnosed with acute thoracic or lumbar intervertebral disc extrusion.

La Rosa C, Morabito S, Carloni A, Davini T, Remelli C, Specchi S Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1302418.

PMID: 38076554 PMC: 10702215. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1302418.


Letter regarding "Developing a predictive model for spinal shock in dogs with spinal cord injury".

Cummings C J Vet Intern Med. 2023; 37(2):400-401.

PMID: 36689101 PMC: 10061182. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16631.


Developing a predictive model for spinal shock in dogs with spinal cord injury.

McBride R, Parker E, Garabed R, Olby N, Tipold A, Stein V J Vet Intern Med. 2022; 36(2):663-671.

PMID: 35001437 PMC: 8965241. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16352.

References
1.
McCOUCH G, Liu C, CHAMBERS W . Descending tracts and spinal shock in the monkey (Macaca mulatta). Brain. 1966; 89(2):359-76. DOI: 10.1093/brain/89.2.359. View

2.
Hunt R, MELTZER G, Landau W . FUSIMOTOR FUNCTION. I. SPINAL SHOCK OF THE CAT AND THE MONKEY. Arch Neurol. 1963; 9:120-6. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1963.00460080030003. View

3.
Nacimiento W, Noth J . What, if anything, is spinal shock?. Arch Neurol. 1999; 56(8):1033-5. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.56.8.1033. View

4.
Leis A, Kronenberg M, Stetkarova I, Paske W, Stokic D . Spinal motoneuron excitability after acute spinal cord injury in humans. Neurology. 1996; 47(1):231-7. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.47.1.231. View

5.
Miller J, Paul K, Lee R, Rymer W, Heckman C . Restoration of extensor excitability in the acute spinal cat by the 5-HT2 agonist DOI. J Neurophysiol. 1996; 75(2):620-8. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.2.620. View