» Articles » PMID: 34979212

Dosimetric Impact of Interfraction Prostate and Seminal Vesicle Volume Changes and Rotation: A Post-hoc Analysis of a Phase III Randomized Trial of MRI-guided Versus CT-guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Overview
Journal Radiother Oncol
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2022 Jan 3
PMID 34979212
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Interfraction volumetric changes/rotations in the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles (SVs) might compromise target coverage when tight margins are used for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We investigated on-board MRI images from MRI-guided SBRT to better understand this.

Materials And Methods: Twenty consecutive patients treated with MRI-guided prostate SBRT (40 Gy/5 fractions) enrolled on the MRI arm of a phase III randomized trial were included. A 2 mm isotropic margin was used for prostate and proximal SVPTV. Target volume, prostate dimensions, angles of the proximal SV on axial (angle α) and sagittal view (angle θ) were measured on a 0.35 T simulation MRI and five on-board pre-treatment MRIs. Dice coefficient of the targets and target dosimetry were calculated.

Results: All patients experienced an isotropic increase in prostate volume during SBRT (p = 0.0016): 0.1%, 9.0%, 12.1%, 15.1%, and 14.2% (median) at fractions 1-5, respectively, regardless of baseline volume, which was significantly reduced with neoadjuvant ADT (p = 0.0042). There was minimal interfraction rotation of prostate, however, considerable variations in proximal SV angle α (median 21.5°) and angle θ (median 17.6°) were seen. Median V100% was 97.5% and 87.1% for prostate and proximal SV CTV, respectively. V95%≥95% was achieved in 94% of fractions for the prostate and in 59% for proximal SV.

Conclusion: Prostate volume consistently increased during SBRT. Interfraction prostatic rotation was minimal while rotation of the proximal SV was considerable. Prostate dosimetry was favorable, but online adaptive therapy may be indicated occasionally to account for prostatic swelling and in particular proximal SV rotations.

Citing Articles

Treatment accuracy of standard linear accelerator-based prostate SBRT: the delivered dose assessment of patients treated within two major clinical trials using an in-house position monitoring system.

Arumugam S, Young T, Jones C, Pryor D, Sidhom M Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1372968.

PMID: 39184052 PMC: 11341385. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1372968.


Magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy enables safe CTV-to-PTV margin reduction in prostate cancer: a cine MRI motion study.

Westley R, Alexander S, Goodwin E, Dunlop A, Nill S, Oelfke U Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1379596.

PMID: 38894866 PMC: 11183304. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1379596.


Comparing Efficacy Between Robust and PTV Margin-based Optimizations for Interfractional Anatomical Variations in Prostate Tomotherapy.

Yagihashi T, Inoue T, Shiba S, Yamano A, Yamanaka M, Sato N In Vivo. 2023; 38(1):409-417.

PMID: 38148099 PMC: 10756445. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13453.


MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: The Next Frontier in Ultrahypofractionation.

Benitez C, Steinberg M, Cao M, Qi X, Lamb J, Kishan A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(18).

PMID: 37760626 PMC: 10526919. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184657.


Clinical Applications of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy: A Narrative Review.

Ladbury C, Amini A, Schwer A, Liu A, Williams T, Lee P Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(11).

PMID: 37296879 PMC: 10251893. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112916.