» Articles » PMID: 34976693

Sugar-sweetened Beverage Consumption Among Adults in Rural Appalachia

Overview
Journal Prev Med Rep
Date 2022 Jan 3
PMID 34976693
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption is decreasing nationally, yet intakes remain high in certain sub-populations as new varieties of SSBs are introduced. This study aims to expand on SSB intake patterns among adults living in Appalachia to develop policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) interventions to reduce consumption. Baseline cohort surveys were conducted to examine beverage consumption patterns of adults in one rural Appalachian county in Kentucky using a validated BEVQ-15 instrument. Ages were collapsed into three generational groups - Millennials (22-38 years), Generation X (39-54 years), and Boomers/Silents (≥55 years). Over half (n = 81; 54%) of the sample (n = 150) were Boomers/Silents. Age was a significant predictor of SSB consumption, with Millennials drinking more daily calories of SSB compared to older adults (329.2 kcal v 157.0 kcal v 134.6 kcal, p = 0.05); a significant amount of those calories coming from non-soda SSBs. Millennials were twice as likely to drink sweetened fruit juice drinks (p = 0.0002) and energy drinks (p = 0.01) daily and consumed six times more daily calories from sweetened fruit juice drinks than the other groups (73.5 kcal v 11.1 kcal v 8.0 kcal, p < 0.01). To our knowledge, this is the first study to show beverage choices and consumption patterns in Appalachian adults vary by age and non-soda SSBs are significant sources of added sugar. These findings inform PSE interventions for reducing SSB consumption, such as tailored marketing approaches and technology-based strategies, within a unique setting, and offer insight for nutrition educators and public health professionals working within rural, remote communities.

Citing Articles

Self-Reported Consumption of Bottled Water v. Tap Water in Appalachian and Non-Appalachian Kentucky.

Marion J J Appalach Health. 2023; 5(2):32-49.

PMID: 38022490 PMC: 10629886. DOI: 10.13023/jah.0502.04.


Impact of community-driven interventions on dietary and physical activity outcomes among a cohort of adults in a rural Appalachian county in Eastern Kentucky, 2019-2022.

Norman-Burgdolf H, DeWitt E, Gillespie R, Cardarelli K, Slone S, Gustafson A Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1142478.

PMID: 37124781 PMC: 10140309. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1142478.


The Impact of a Grocery Store Closure in One Rural Highly Obese Appalachian Community on Shopping Behavior and Dietary Intake.

Gillespie R, DeWitt E, Slone S, Cardarelli K, Gustafson A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(6).

PMID: 35329193 PMC: 8951354. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063506.

References
1.
Lane H, Porter K, Hecht E, Harris P, Zoellner J . A Participatory Process to Engage Appalachian Youth in Reducing Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption. Health Promot Pract. 2018; 20(2):258-268. PMC: 6119513. DOI: 10.1177/1524839918762123. View

2.
Han E, Powell L . Consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 113(1):43-53. PMC: 3662243. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.09.016. View

3.
Malik V, Schulze M, Hu F . Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 84(2):274-88. PMC: 3210834. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/84.1.274. View

4.
Molitor F, Doerr C . SNAP-Ed Policy, Systems, and Environmental Interventions and Caregivers' Dietary Behaviors. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020; 52(11):1052-1057. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.05.013. View

5.
Zoellner J, Estabrooks P, Davy B, Chen Y, You W . Exploring the theory of planned behavior to explain sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011; 44(2):172-7. PMC: 3290682. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.06.010. View