» Articles » PMID: 34972969

An Update on Immune Based Therapies in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 2021 and Beyond!

Overview
Date 2022 Jan 1
PMID 34972969
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite advances in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), relapse is still widely observed and represents the major cause of death among patients with AML. Treatment options in the relapse setting are limited, still relying predominantly on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and cytotoxic chemotherapy, with poor outcomes. Novel targeted and venetoclax-based combinations are being investigated and have shown encouraging results. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy demonstrated encouraging response rates and survival among patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) AML, especially in the pre- and post-allo-HSCT setting. Blocking the CD47/SIRPα pathway is another strategy that showed robust anti-leukemic activity, with a response rate of around 70% and an encouraging median overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed, higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and patients with AML with a TP53 mutation. One approach that was proven to be very effective in the relapsed setting of lymphoid malignancies is chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. It relies on the infusion of genetically engineered T cells capable of recognizing specific epitopes on the surface of leukemia cells. In AML, different CAR constructs with different target antigens have been evaluated and demonstrated safety and feasibility in the R/R setting. However, the difficulty of potently targeting leukemic blasts in AML while sparing normal cells represents a major limitation to their use, and strategies are being tested to overcome this obstacle. A different approach is based on endogenously redirecting the patient's system cells to target and destroy leukemic cells via bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) or dual antigen receptor targeting (DARTs). Early results have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of these agents, and research is ongoing to develop BiTEs with longer half-life, allowing for less frequent administration schedules and developing them in earlier and lower disease burden settings.

Citing Articles

The Immune Resistance Signature of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Current Immunotherapy Strategies.

Chandra D, Alber B, Saultz J Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(15).

PMID: 39123343 PMC: 11311077. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152615.


TP53-Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Biology, Current Therapy, and Future Directions.

Daver N, Maiti A, Kadia T, Vyas P, Majeti R, Wei A Cancer Discov. 2022; 12(11):2516-2529.

PMID: 36218325 PMC: 9627130. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0332.

References
1.
Murati A, Brecqueville M, Devillier R, Mozziconacci M, Gelsi-Boyer V, Birnbaum D . Myeloid malignancies: mutations, models and management. BMC Cancer. 2012; 12:304. PMC: 3418560. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-304. View

2.
Herold T, Rothenberg-Thurley M, Grunwald V, Janke H, Goerlich D, Sauerland M . Validation and refinement of the revised 2017 European LeukemiaNet genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2020; 34(12):3161-3172. PMC: 7685975. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0806-0. View

3.
Baudard M, Delmer A, Rio B, Blanc C, Zittoun R, Marie J . Has the prognosis of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia improved over years? A single institution experience of 784 consecutive patients over a 16-year period. Leukemia. 1999; 13(10):1481-90. DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401544. View

4.
Chen K, Gilabert-Oriol R, Bally M, Leung A . Recent Treatment Advances and the Role of Nanotechnology, Combination Products, and Immunotherapy in Changing the Therapeutic Landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Pharm Res. 2019; 36(9):125. PMC: 6591181. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-019-2654-z. View

5.
Tamamyan G, Kadia T, Ravandi F, Borthakur G, Cortes J, Jabbour E . Frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in adults. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017; 110:20-34. PMC: 5410376. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.12.004. View