» Articles » PMID: 34968385

Realistic Retinal Modeling Unravels the Differential Role of Excitation and Inhibition to Starburst Amacrine Cells in Direction Selectivity

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Dec 30
PMID 34968385
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Retinal direction-selectivity originates in starburst amacrine cells (SACs), which display a centrifugal preference, responding with greater depolarization to a stimulus expanding from soma to dendrites than to a collapsing stimulus. Various mechanisms were hypothesized to underlie SAC centrifugal preference, but dissociating them is experimentally challenging and the mechanisms remain debatable. To address this issue, we developed the Retinal Stimulation Modeling Environment (RSME), a multifaceted data-driven retinal model that encompasses detailed neuronal morphology and biophysical properties, retina-tailored connectivity scheme and visual input. Using a genetic algorithm, we demonstrated that spatiotemporally diverse excitatory inputs-sustained in the proximal and transient in the distal processes-are sufficient to generate experimentally validated centrifugal preference in a single SAC. Reversing these input kinetics did not produce any centrifugal-preferring SAC. We then explored the contribution of SAC-SAC inhibitory connections in establishing the centrifugal preference. SAC inhibitory network enhanced the centrifugal preference, but failed to generate it in its absence. Embedding a direction selective ganglion cell (DSGC) in a SAC network showed that the known SAC-DSGC asymmetric connectivity by itself produces direction selectivity. Still, this selectivity is sharpened in a centrifugal-preferring SAC network. Finally, we use RSME to demonstrate the contribution of SAC-SAC inhibitory connections in mediating direction selectivity and recapitulate recent experimental findings. Thus, using RSME, we obtained a mechanistic understanding of SACs' centrifugal preference and its contribution to direction selectivity.

Citing Articles

Heterogeneous presynaptic receptive fields contribute to directional tuning in starburst amacrine cells.

Gaynes J, Budoff S, Grybko M, Poleg-Polsky A Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 38149980 PMC: 10752589. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.90456.


Heterogeneous presynaptic receptive fields contribute to directional tuning in starburst amacrine cells.

Gaynes J, Budoff S, Grybko M, Poleg-Polsky A bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37577661 PMC: 10418172. DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.02.551732.


Spatiotemporal properties of glutamate input support direction selectivity in the dendrites of retinal starburst amacrine cells.

Srivastava P, de Rosenroll G, Matsumoto A, Michaels T, Turple Z, Jain V Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 36346388 PMC: 9674338. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.81533.


Origins of direction selectivity in the primate retina.

Kim Y, Peterson B, Crook J, Joo H, Wu J, Puller C Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):2862.

PMID: 35606344 PMC: 9126974. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30405-5.

References
1.
Matsumoto A, Agbariah W, Nolte S, Andrawos R, Levi H, Sabbah S . Direction selectivity in retinal bipolar cell axon terminals. Neuron. 2021; 109(23):3895-3896. PMC: 8648187. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.11.004. View

2.
Pillow J, Paninski L, Uzzell V, Simoncelli E, Chichilnisky E . Prediction and decoding of retinal ganglion cell responses with a probabilistic spiking model. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(47):11003-13. PMC: 6725882. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3305-05.2005. View

3.
Fried S, Munch T, Werblin F . Directional selectivity is formed at multiple levels by laterally offset inhibition in the rabbit retina. Neuron. 2005; 46(1):117-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.007. View

4.
Mauss A, Vlasits A, Borst A, Feller M . Visual Circuits for Direction Selectivity. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017; 40:211-230. PMC: 6893907. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031335. View

5.
Wei W . Neural Mechanisms of Motion Processing in the Mammalian Retina. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2018; 4:165-192. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-091517-034048. View