» Articles » PMID: 34958487

Informative Title: Guided Bone Regeneration with and Without RhBMP-2: 17-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Dec 27
PMID 34958487
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess long-term outcomes of implants placed in conjunction with guided bone regeneration (GBR) with or without recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2).

Materials And Methods: Eleven patients with at least two lateral bone defects (split-mouth design) received a total of 34 implants. The defects were treated with a xenogenic bone substitute with (test) or without (control) rhBMP-2 and covered with a collagen membrane. Eight patients could be reexamined after at least 17 years. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to assess differences between test and control groups.

Results: The implant survival rate was 100% for all test and control sites. Mean marginal bone levels were 2.51 mm (SD ±1.64) (mesial test), 1.83 mm (SD ±0.93) (mesial control) (p = .055), 2.36 mm (SD ±1.70) (distal test), and 2.13 mm (SD ±0.84) (distal control) (p = 1.000). Compared with the mean values at baseline, a mean bone loss of 1.16 mm (SD ±1.60) (test) and 0.70 mm (SD ±1.02) (control) was found. The mean buccal bone gain after 17 years was 5.38 mm (test) and 3.14 mm (control) based on the comparison between the measurements at the cone beam CT after 17 years and the data from the intraoperative measurements at baseline. Further, mean values for (i) bone thickness ranged from 1.36 to 3.09 mm (test) and 1.18 to 3.39 mm (control) and for (ii) mucosal thickness of 1.24 mm (test) and 1.26 mm (control).

Conclusion: Implants placed in conjunction with GBR applying a xenogenic bone substitute and a collagen membrane with and without the addition of rhBMP-2 demonstrate excellent clinical and radiographic results after at least 17 years.

Citing Articles

Bioactive peptides and proteins for tissue repair: microenvironment modulation, rational delivery, and clinical potential.

Hao Z, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Wang Y, Chen J, Chen T Mil Med Res. 2024; 11(1):75.

PMID: 39639374 PMC: 11619216. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-024-00576-x.


Effect of Applying 1% Metformin on Guided Bone Regeneration Processes with Bovine-Derived Xenografts.

Montalban-Vadillo O, Perez-Pevida E, Viteri-Agustin I, Chavarri-Prado D, Estrada-Martinez A, Dieguez-Pereira M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 38792514 PMC: 11122524. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102973.


Informative title: Guided bone regeneration with and without rhBMP-2: 17-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Jung R, Kovacs M, Thoma D, Hammerle C Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021; 33(3):302-312.

PMID: 34958487 PMC: 9305166. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13889.

References
1.
Rodoni L, Glauser R, Feloutzis A, Hammerle C . Implants in the posterior maxilla: a comparative clinical and radiologic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20(2):231-7. View

2.
Kolerman R, Nissan J, Tal H . Combined osteotome-induced ridge expansion and guided bone regeneration simultaneous with implant placement: a biometric study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013; 16(5):691-704. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12041. View

3.
Noshchenko A, Hoffecker L, Lindley E, Burger E, Cain C, Patel V . Perioperative and long-term clinical outcomes for bone morphogenetic protein versus iliac crest bone graft for lumbar fusion in degenerative disk disease: systematic review with meta-analysis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014; 27(3):117-35. DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000446752.34233.ca. View

4.
Kao D, Kubota A, Nevins M, Fiorellini J . The negative effect of combining rhBMP-2 and Bio-Oss on bone formation for maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012; 32(1):61-7. View

5.
Lang N, Joss A, Orsanic T, Gusberti F, Siegrist B . Bleeding on probing. A predictor for the progression of periodontal disease?. J Clin Periodontol. 1986; 13(6):590-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb00852.x. View