» Articles » PMID: 34949477

Laboratory Methods to Simulate the Mechanical Degradation of Resin Composite Restorations

Overview
Journal Dent Mater
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Dec 24
PMID 34949477
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study reviewed the literature to identify in vitro approaches that have been used to simulate the mechanical degradation and fatigue of resin composite restorations.

Methods: A search for articles was carried out in 4 databases and included studies in which composite restorations were bonded to teeth and subject to cyclic loading. Articles were assessed for eligibility, and the following items were the extracted from the included studies: authors, country, year, materials tested, simulation device and details including load magnitude and frequency, number of cycles, type of antagonist, test medium, and temperature. Data were analyzed descriptively.

Results: The 49 studies included showed a high level of heterogeneity in methods, devices, and test parameters. Nineteen different simulation devices were used, applying loads varying between 30 and 2900 N, and frequencies varying between 0.4 and 12 Hz. The load and frequency used most often were ~ 50 N (63.3%) and 1.5-1.7 Hz (32.7%). The number of cycles varied between 10 K and 2.4 M, 1.2 M was the most prevalent (40.8%). The majority of studies combined cyclic loading with at least one additional aging method: static liquid storage, thermo-mechanical cycling applied simultaneously, and thermal cycling as a discrete aging step were the three most frequent methods. The overall evidence indicated reporting problems, and suggested a lack of clinical validation of the research methods used.

Significance: Validation studies, underlying clinical supporting data, and better reporting practices are needed for further improving research on the topic. Specific suggestions for future studies are provided.

Citing Articles

Assessment of bond strength and bioactivity on a prototype resin-based luting agent containing a novel bioactive monomer.

Iwasaki T, Kubochi K, Takata H, Komine F Odontology. 2025; .

PMID: 39907940 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-025-01053-0.


Surface Roughness and Color Stability of Conventional and Bulk-Fill Resin Composite with S-PRG Fillers After Coffee Exposure: An in-vitro Study.

Janisch F, Falcon Aguilar M, Aguiar F, Franca F, Basting R, Vieira-Junior W Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025; 17():21-29.

PMID: 39802460 PMC: 11725284. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S496750.


Unveiling the mechanical performance of partially replaced coronal restorations in root canal-treated teeth: an in-vitro study.

Turky M, Plotino G, Mahmoud N BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1562.

PMID: 39731047 PMC: 11673807. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05180-y.


Simulation of oral environmental conditions through artificial aging of teeth for the assessment of enamel discoloration in orthodontics.

Irgin C BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1533.

PMID: 39709403 PMC: 11662843. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05353-9.


Flexural Strength of Modern CAD/CAM Restoratives After Artificial Aging.

Melc T, Attin T, Eyuboglu T, Ozcan M Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(21).

PMID: 39517453 PMC: 11547040. DOI: 10.3390/ma17215178.


References
1.
Montagner A, Opdam N, de Munck J, Cenci M, Van Meerbeek B, Huysmans M . Bonding Efficacy and Fracture Pattern of Adhesives Submitted to Mechanical Aging with the Rub&Roll Device. J Adhes Dent. 2017; 19(1):59-68. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a37721. View

2.
Cuevas-Suarez C, Meereis C, DAccorso N, Macchi R, Ancona-Meza A, Zamarripa-Calderon E . Effect of radiant exposure and UV accelerated aging on physico-chemical and mechanical properties of composite resins. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019; 27:e20180075. PMC: 6322643. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0075. View

3.
Soderholm K, Yang M, Garcea I . Filler particle leachability of experimental dental composites. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001; 108(6):555-60. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.00919.x. View

4.
Soderholm K, Mukherjee R, Longmate J . Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva. J Dent Res. 1996; 75(9):1692-9. DOI: 10.1177/00220345960750091201. View

5.
Kelly J, Benetti P, Rungruanganunt P, Della Bona A . The slippery slope: critical perspectives on in vitro research methodologies. Dent Mater. 2011; 28(1):41-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.001. View