» Articles » PMID: 12820038

Fracture Resistance of Fiber-reinforced Vs. Non-fiber-reinforced Composite Molar Crowns

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2003 Jun 24
PMID 12820038
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: This study compared fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced and non-fiber-reinforced composite molar crowns under simulated oral stress conditions. Three groups of fiber-reinforced composite crowns were constructed using one polyethylene fiber (belleGlass/Connect) and two glass fiber reinforcement systems (Sculpture/FiberKor, Targis/Vectris). The non-fiber-reinforced crowns based on the facing material alone: Sculpture, Targis or belleGlass. Additionally, crowns were made of the non-reinforced composite Artglass. Each group consisted of eight crowns. All crowns were luted to human molars and exposed to thermal cycling and mechanical loading (6000 x 5 degrees C/55 degrees C; 1.2 x 10(6x)50 N; 1.66 Hz). The fracture resistance was measured using a Zwick universal testing machine.

Results: The non-reinforced Artglass crowns demonstrated the highest fracture resistance, significantly higher than the resistance shown with belleGlass, belleGlass/Connect or Targis. Artglass showed an extremely wide distribution of values, however. No statistically significant differences were found between the reinforced and non-reinforced composite crowns of Vectris/Targis, FiberKor/Sculpture or Connect/belleGlass although the reinforced crowns showed a tendency towards higher values. The fracture resistance values scattered markedly more for the reinforced crowns, and their lowest fracture values also reached the level of the lowest non-reinforced crowns. The small distribution of fracture values for the non-reinforced crowns indicates that they will be less susceptible for manufacturing faults and more reliable under clinical conditions.

Conclusions: RESULTS of this study suggest that single molar composite crowns (tested in this study) do not benefit from fiber-reinforcement.

Citing Articles

The Ability of Two Chewing Simulation Devices in Emulating the Clinical Deterioration of Anterior Composite Restorations in Severely Worn Teeth.

Lima V, Moraes R, Opdam N, Ruben J, Huysmans M, Loomans B J Adhes Dent. 2022; 24():19-28.

PMID: 35227043 PMC: 11734242. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.b2701665.


Laboratory methods to simulate the mechanical degradation of resin composite restorations.

Lima V, Machado J, Zhang Y, Loomans B, Moraes R Dent Mater. 2021; 38(1):214-229.

PMID: 34949477 PMC: 9903973. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.006.


Comparison of Load-Bearing Capacities of 3-Unit Fiber-Reinforced Composite Adhesive Bridges with Different Framework Designs.

Tacir I, Dirihan R, Polat Z, Salman G, Vallittu P, Lassila L Med Sci Monit. 2018; 24:4440-4448.

PMID: 29950555 PMC: 6054775. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.909271.


Natural Tooth Pontic: An Instant Esthetic Option for Periodontally Compromised Teeth-A Case Series.

Raj R, Mehrotra K, Narayan I, Gowda T, Mehta D Case Rep Dent. 2016; 2016:8502927.

PMID: 27994892 PMC: 5138465. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8502927.


Mechanical behavior of single-layer ceramized zirconia abutments for dental implant prosthetic rehabilitation.

Jimenez-Melendo M, Llena-Blasco O, Bruguera A, Llena-Blasco J, Yanez-Vico R, Garcia-Calderon M J Clin Exp Dent. 2015; 6(5):e485-90.

PMID: 25674313 PMC: 4312673. DOI: 10.4317/jced.51442.

References
1.
Freilich M, Karmaker A, Burstone C, Goldberg A . Development and clinical applications of a light-polymerized fiber-reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80(3):311-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70131-3. View

2.
Swift Jr E, Cloe B, Boyer D . Effect of a silane coupling agent on composite repair strengths. Am J Dent. 1994; 7(4):200-2. View

3.
Rosentritt M, Plein T, Kolbeck C, Behr M, Handel G . In vitro fracture force and marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns fixed on natural and artificial teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 13(5):387-91. View

4.
Loose M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Behr M, Handel G . In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of fibre-reinforced-composite versus all ceramic fixed partial dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1999; 6(2):55-62. View

5.
Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G . Fiber-reinforced composite crowns and FPDs: a clinical report. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16(3):239-43. View