Fracture Resistance of Fiber-reinforced Vs. Non-fiber-reinforced Composite Molar Crowns
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Unlabelled: This study compared fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced and non-fiber-reinforced composite molar crowns under simulated oral stress conditions. Three groups of fiber-reinforced composite crowns were constructed using one polyethylene fiber (belleGlass/Connect) and two glass fiber reinforcement systems (Sculpture/FiberKor, Targis/Vectris). The non-fiber-reinforced crowns based on the facing material alone: Sculpture, Targis or belleGlass. Additionally, crowns were made of the non-reinforced composite Artglass. Each group consisted of eight crowns. All crowns were luted to human molars and exposed to thermal cycling and mechanical loading (6000 x 5 degrees C/55 degrees C; 1.2 x 10(6x)50 N; 1.66 Hz). The fracture resistance was measured using a Zwick universal testing machine.
Results: The non-reinforced Artglass crowns demonstrated the highest fracture resistance, significantly higher than the resistance shown with belleGlass, belleGlass/Connect or Targis. Artglass showed an extremely wide distribution of values, however. No statistically significant differences were found between the reinforced and non-reinforced composite crowns of Vectris/Targis, FiberKor/Sculpture or Connect/belleGlass although the reinforced crowns showed a tendency towards higher values. The fracture resistance values scattered markedly more for the reinforced crowns, and their lowest fracture values also reached the level of the lowest non-reinforced crowns. The small distribution of fracture values for the non-reinforced crowns indicates that they will be less susceptible for manufacturing faults and more reliable under clinical conditions.
Conclusions: RESULTS of this study suggest that single molar composite crowns (tested in this study) do not benefit from fiber-reinforcement.
Lima V, Moraes R, Opdam N, Ruben J, Huysmans M, Loomans B J Adhes Dent. 2022; 24():19-28.
PMID: 35227043 PMC: 11734242. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.b2701665.
Laboratory methods to simulate the mechanical degradation of resin composite restorations.
Lima V, Machado J, Zhang Y, Loomans B, Moraes R Dent Mater. 2021; 38(1):214-229.
PMID: 34949477 PMC: 9903973. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.006.
Tacir I, Dirihan R, Polat Z, Salman G, Vallittu P, Lassila L Med Sci Monit. 2018; 24:4440-4448.
PMID: 29950555 PMC: 6054775. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.909271.
Natural Tooth Pontic: An Instant Esthetic Option for Periodontally Compromised Teeth-A Case Series.
Raj R, Mehrotra K, Narayan I, Gowda T, Mehta D Case Rep Dent. 2016; 2016:8502927.
PMID: 27994892 PMC: 5138465. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8502927.
Jimenez-Melendo M, Llena-Blasco O, Bruguera A, Llena-Blasco J, Yanez-Vico R, Garcia-Calderon M J Clin Exp Dent. 2015; 6(5):e485-90.
PMID: 25674313 PMC: 4312673. DOI: 10.4317/jced.51442.