» Articles » PMID: 34947903

SARS-CoV-2 Inactivation Simulation Using 14 MeV Neutron Irradiation

Overview
Journal Life (Basel)
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Dec 24
PMID 34947903
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 virus is deadly, contagious, can cause COVID-19 disease, and endangers public health and safety. The development of SARS-CoV-2 inactivation technology is crucial and imminent in current pandemic period. Neutron radiation is usually used to sterilize viruses because neutron radiation is 10 times more effective than gamma-rays in inactivating viruses. In this work we established a closed SARS-CoV-2 inactivation container model by the Monte Carlo method and simulated the inactivation performance by using several different neutrons sources. To study the effects of inactivation container factors, including the reflector thickness, the type of the reflector material, the SARS-CoV-2 layer area and the distance from the radiation source on the energy deposition of a single neutron particle in SARS-CoV-2 sample, we simulated the neutron energy deposition on a SARS-CoV-2 sample. The simulation results indicate that the saturated thicknesses of reflector materials for graphite, water and paraffin are approximately 30 cm, 15 cm, and 10 cm, respectively, and the energy deposition (radiation dose) becomes larger when the SARS-CoV-2 layer area is smaller and the SARS-CoV-2 layer is placed closer to the neutron source. The calculated single-neutron energy deposition on 10 × 10 cm SARS-CoV-2 layer is about 3.0059 × 10 MeV/g with graphite as the reflection layer, when the 14 MeV neutron source intensity is 10 n/s and the SARS-CoV-2 layer is 5 cm away from the neutron source. If the lethal dose of SARS-CoV-2 is assumed as the IAEA recommended reference dose, 25 kGy, the SARS-CoV-2 could be decontaminated in about 87 min, and the sterilization time could be less than 52 s if the 14 MeV neutron intensity is increased to 10 n/s.

Citing Articles

Optimization of sterilization efficiency for medical surgical blades in gamma irradiation using the Monte Carlo method.

Bian J, Liu F, Tang Y, Zhao Q, Lyu X, Cheng J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8490.

PMID: 40074781 PMC: 11903890. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90327-2.


A simulation study on enhancing sterilization efficiency in medical plastics through gamma radiation optimization.

Yuan X, Liu F, Zhou H, Liu B, Li G, Yan P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20289.

PMID: 37985894 PMC: 10660597. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47771-9.


COVID-19 Prevention and Treatment.

De Francia S, Chiara F, Allegra S Life (Basel). 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36983989 PMC: 10059649. DOI: 10.3390/life13030834.


Viral inactivation by light.

Sadraeian M, Zhang L, Aavani F, Biazar E, Jin D eLight. 2022; 2(1):18.

PMID: 36187558 PMC: 9510523. DOI: 10.1186/s43593-022-00029-9.

References
1.
Bachofer C . Direct effect of x-rays on bacterial viruses, modified by physical state, in relation to the target theory. Science. 1953; 117(3037):280-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.117.3037.280. View

2.
Casais R, Dove B, Cavanagh D, Britton P . Recombinant avian infectious bronchitis virus expressing a heterologous spike gene demonstrates that the spike protein is a determinant of cell tropism. J Virol. 2003; 77(16):9084-9. PMC: 167237. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.77.16.9084-9089.2003. View

3.
Michel C, Mayer C, Poch O, Thompson J . Characterization of accessory genes in coronavirus genomes. Virol J. 2020; 17(1):131. PMC: 7450977. DOI: 10.1186/s12985-020-01402-1. View

4.
Klein S, Cortese M, Winter S, Wachsmuth-Melm M, Neufeldt C, Cerikan B . SARS-CoV-2 structure and replication characterized by in situ cryo-electron tomography. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):5885. PMC: 7676268. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19619-7. View

5.
Liu B, Wang Q . Neutron-based sterilization of anthrax contamination. Health Phys. 2006; 90(5 Suppl):S80-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.HP.0000214657.44059.ae. View