» Articles » PMID: 34945707

An Alternative Nutrient Rich Food Index (NRF-ai) Incorporating Prevalence of Inadequate and Excessive Nutrient Intake

Overview
Journal Foods
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2021 Dec 24
PMID 34945707
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most nutrient profiling models give equal weight to nutrients irrespective of their ubiquity in the food system. There is also a degree of arbitrariness about which nutrients are included. In this study, an alternative Nutrient Rich Food index was developed (NRF-ai, where ai denotes adequate intake) incorporating prevalence of inadequate and excessive nutrient intake among Australian adults. Weighting factors for individual nutrients were based on a distance-to-target method using data from the Australian Health Survey describing the proportion of the population with usual intake less than the Estimated Average Requirement defined by the Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand. All nutrients for which data were available were included, avoiding judgements about which nutrients to include, although some nutrients received little weight. Separate models were developed for females and males and for selected age groups, reflecting differences in nutrient requirements and usual intake. Application of the new nutrient profiling models is demonstrated for selected dairy products and alternatives, protein-rich foods, and discretionary foods. This approach emphasises the need to identify foods that are rich in those specific nutrients for which intake is below recommended levels and can be used to address specific nutrient gaps in subgroups such as older adults. In addition, the new nutrient profiling model is used to explore other sustainability aspects, including affordability (NRF-ai per AUD) and ecoefficiency (NRF-ai/environmental impact score).

Citing Articles

Impact of Dairy Products and Plant-Based Alternatives on Dental Health: Food Matrix Effects.

Shkembi B, Huppertz T Nutrients. 2023; 15(6).

PMID: 36986199 PMC: 10056336. DOI: 10.3390/nu15061469.


Relevance of sex-differenced analyses in bioenergetics and nutritional studies.

Garrabou G, Garcia-Garcia F, Presmanes R, Feu M, Chiva-Blanch G Front Nutr. 2022; 9:936929.

PMID: 36245509 PMC: 9562369. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.936929.


The importance of protein variety in a higher quality and lower environmental impact dietary pattern.

Ridoutt B, Baird D, Hendrie G Public Health Nutr. 2022; :1-6.

PMID: 36210777 PMC: 9991774. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980022002221.


Nutritional assessment of plant-based beverages in comparison to bovine milk.

Smith N, Dave A, Hill J, McNabb W Front Nutr. 2022; 9:957486.

PMID: 36003838 PMC: 9394682. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.957486.

References
1.
Tharrey M, Maillot M, Azais-Braesco V, Darmon N . From the SAIN,LIM system to the SENS algorithm: a review of a French approach of nutrient profiling. Proc Nutr Soc. 2017; 76(3):237-246. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665117000817. View

2.
Drewnowski A . The Nutrient Rich Foods Index helps to identify healthy, affordable foods. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 91(4):1095S-1101S. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450D. View

3.
. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019; 393(10184):1958-1972. PMC: 6899507. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8. View

4.
Drewnowski A, Fulgoni 3rd V . New Nutrient Rich Food Nutrient Density Models That Include Nutrients and MyPlate Food Groups. Front Nutr. 2020; 7:107. PMC: 7387572. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00107. View

5.
Blackstone N, El-Abbadi N, McCabe M, Griffin T, Nelson M . Linking sustainability to the healthy eating patterns of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans: a modelling study. Lancet Planet Health. 2018; 2(8):e344-e352. DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30167-0. View