» Articles » PMID: 34938861

Hot Saline Irrigation in Comparison to Nasal Packing After Sinus Surgery

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2021 Dec 23
PMID 34938861
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Previous studies have shown that hot saline solution (HSS) nasal irrigation is effective against nasal bleeding and is used to treat nasal hemorrhage. In a pilot study, we evaluated hot saline nasal irrigation in comparison to a routinely used nasal packing in terms of self-reported complications and mucosal healing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis received polyvinyl acetate (PVA) nasal packing in the left nostril, and the right nostril was rinsed with 47°C sterile saline immediately after surgery. Patients' experiences of pain, bleeding, and other types of uncomfortable experiences were measured using a visual analog scale for each nostril before, during, and immediately after nasal packing removal. Two weeks post-surgery, the assessments were repeated including an endoscopic evaluation of the mucosa by the surgeon.

Results: Twenty-seven patients completed the study. Prior to removal of the packing, the patients experienced significantly more pain and other uncomfortable experiences in the nostril treated with nasal packing, as compared to the nostril solely rinsed with hot saline. After removal, patients reported significantly more uncomfortable experiences from the packing treated nostril. Two weeks post-surgery, no difference in mucosal healing was observed between the two nostrils.

Conclusions: The results from this study indicate that irrigation with HSS could be an alternative postoperative treatment to conventional PVA nasal packing. Hot saline irrigation may contribute to patients experiencing improved control of postoperative bleeding, pain, and less suffering of other causes as well as health-economic benefits, without affecting the mucosal healing up to 2 weeks post-surgery.

Level Of Evidence: 1b.

Citing Articles

The nomogram for predicting nasal bleeding after endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas: a retrospective study.

Wang Y, Wang W, Huang Q, Yan W, Lan M Front Surg. 2024; 11:1409298.

PMID: 39100727 PMC: 11294194. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1409298.


Hot saline irrigation in comparison to nasal packing after sinus surgery.

Nordstrom A, Jangard M, Svedberg M, Kullenberg H, Ryott M, Kumlin M Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021; 6(6):1267-1274.

PMID: 34938861 PMC: 8665458. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.696.

References
1.
Hobson C, Choby G, Wang E, Morton S, Lee S . Systematic review and metaanalysis of middle meatal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015; 29(2):135-40. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4153. View

2.
Vlastarakos P, Iacovou E, Fetta M, Tapis M, Nikolopoulos T . How effective is postoperative packing in FESS patients? A critical analysis of published interventional studies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 273(12):4061-4071. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3863-7. View

3.
Wee J, Lee C, Rhee C, Kim J . Comparison between Gelfoam packing and no packing after endoscopic sinus surgery in the same patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011; 269(3):897-903. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1768-7. View

4.
Dudvarski Z, Djukic V, Janosevic L, Tomanovic N, Soldatovic I . Influence of asthma on quality of life and clinical characteristics of patients with nasal polyposis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; 270(4):1379-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2242-x. View

5.
Samad I, Stevens H, Maloney A . The efficacy of nasal septal surgery. J Otolaryngol. 1992; 21(2):88-91. View