» Articles » PMID: 34932394

Dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 Checkpoint Blockade Using Balstilimab and Zalifrelimab Combination As Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Cervical Cancer: An Open-Label Phase II Study

Abstract

Purpose: Balstilimab (antiprogrammed death-1) and zalifrelimab (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4) are two new checkpoint inhibitors emerging as promising investigational agents for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. This phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03495882) evaluated the combination of balstilimab plus zalifrelimab in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer who relapsed after prior platinum-based therapy.

Patients And Methods: Patients were intravenously dosed with balstilimab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks and zalifrelimab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks, for up to 24 months. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR, RECIST version 1.1, assessed by independent central review). Secondary end points included duration of response, safety and tolerability, and survival.

Results: In total, 155 women (median age, 50 years [range, 24-76 years]) were enrolled and treated with balstilimab plus zalifrelimab; 125 patients had measurable disease at baseline and one prior line of platinum-based therapy in the advanced setting, and these patients constituted the efficacy-evaluable population. The median follow-up was 21 months. The confirmed ORR was 25.6% (95% CI, 18.8 to 33.9), including 10 complete responders and 22 partial responders, with median duration of response not reached (86.5%, 75.5%, and 64.2% at 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively). The ORRs were 32.8% and 9.1% in patients with programmed death ligand-1-positive and programmed death ligand-1-negative tumors, respectively. For patients with squamous cell carcinoma, the ORR was 32.6%. The overall disease control rate was 52% (95% CI, 43.3 to 60.6). Hypothyroidism (14.2%) and hyperthyroidism (7.1%) were the most common immune-mediated adverse events.

Conclusion: Promising and durable clinical activity, with favorable tolerability, was seen in this largest trial to date evaluating dual programmed death-1/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 blockade in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer. Further investigation of the balstilimab and zalifrelimab combination in this setting is continuing.

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a first-line treatment with cadonilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer in China: COMPASSION-16 trial.

Ding Y, Wang C, Shu Y, Wang J, Zhang Q J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025; 18(1):2464781.

PMID: 39968321 PMC: 11834776. DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2464781.


Hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with a PD-1 inhibitor, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor, and thymosin-α1 in advanced metastatic solid tumors: a multicenter Phase II clinical trial.

Yu J, Yin L, Guo W, Wang Q, Liu J, Zhang L Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025; 74(3):98.

PMID: 39904914 PMC: 11794727. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-024-03934-9.


Recent advances in immunotherapy for cervical cancer.

Ogasawara A, Hasegawa K Int J Clin Oncol. 2025; 30(3):434-448.

PMID: 39888529 PMC: 11842527. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-025-02699-0.


Single-cell RNA sequencing and immune microenvironment analysis reveal PLOD2-driven malignant transformation in cervical cancer.

Lin Z, Wang F, Yin R, Li S, Bai Y, Zhang B Front Immunol. 2025; 15():1522655.

PMID: 39840054 PMC: 11747275. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1522655.


GX-188E DNA vaccine plus pembrolizumab in HPV 16- and/or 18-positive recurrent or advance cervical cancer: a phase 2 trial.

Lim M, Choi Y, Hur S, Kim Y, No J, Kim B EClinicalMedicine. 2025; 74():102716.

PMID: 39823099 PMC: 11736335. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102716.


References
1.
Zhou S, Khanal S, Zhang H . Risk of immune-related adverse events associated with ipilimumab-plus-nivolumab and nivolumab therapy in cancer patients. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019; 15:211-221. PMC: 6362938. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S193338. View

2.
Xu C, Chen Y, Du X, Liu J, Huang C, Chen L . Comparative safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018; 363:k4226. PMC: 6222274. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k4226. View

3.
Buchbinder E, Desai A . CTLA-4 and PD-1 Pathways: Similarities, Differences, and Implications of Their Inhibition. Am J Clin Oncol. 2015; 39(1):98-106. PMC: 4892769. DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000239. View

4.
Chen J, Li S, Yao Q, Du N, Fu X, Lou Y . The efficacy and safety of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab plus ipilimumab): a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2020; 18(1):150. PMC: 7334852. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01933-5. View

5.
Johnson D, Balko J, Compton M, Chalkias S, Gorham J, Xu Y . Fulminant Myocarditis with Combination Immune Checkpoint Blockade. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(18):1749-1755. PMC: 5247797. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609214. View