» Articles » PMID: 3492124

Total Digital Radiology Department: Spatial Resolution Requirements

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 1987 Feb 1
PMID 3492124
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The minimum spatial resolution required for a total digital radiology department has yet to be defined. A pilot study designed to provide this information was performed. Abnormal and normal radiographic images of children were digitized and redisplayed on film at spatial resolutions of 5.0, 2.5, 1.25, and 0.625 lp/mm. These resolutions are comparable to a digital display of a 14 X 14 in. chest image having pixel elements of 4096 X 4096, 2048 X 2048, 1024 X 1024, and 512 X 512, respectively. Contrast resolution was maintained at 12 bits or 4096 gray levels. The three phases of data acquisition were (1) the standard analysis of receiver operating characteristics, (2) a checklist evaluation of the "seeability" of important structures, and (3) a comparison of all resolutions and a discernment of usability. Fifteen radiologists participated in the study. On the basis of the pediatric cases used, the results showed that the needed spatial resolution for a total digital radiology department may be around 2.5 lp/mm (2048 X 2048). Checklist data on seeability of structures and comparisons of all resolutions give information on specific changes that are occurring as the resolution is decreased, and, when included with the receiver-operating-characteristic data, they become a major component in developing a resolution standard. The finding that 2.5 lp/mm is the required spatial resolution makes construction of a total digital radiology department possible with present state-of-the-art technology.

Citing Articles

Report on a new type of trauma full-body digital X-ray machine.

Beningfield S, Potgieter H, Nicol A, Van As S, Bowie G, Hering E Emerg Radiol. 2004; 10(1):23-9.

PMID: 15290526 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-003-0271-x.


A comparison between digital images viewed on a picture archiving and communication system diagnostic workstation and on a PC-based remote viewing system by emergency physicians.

Parasyn A, Hanson R, Peat J, De Silva M J Digit Imaging. 1998; 11(1):45-9.

PMID: 9502325 PMC: 3453149. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168724.


Clinical assessment of Hokkaido University PACS.

Miyasaka K, Kudo T Med Biol Eng Comput. 1997; 35(4):391-6.

PMID: 9327618 DOI: 10.1007/BF02534096.


Radiology services for remote communities: cost minimisation study of telemedicine.

Halvorsen P, Kristiansen I BMJ. 1996; 312(7042):1333-6.

PMID: 8646045 PMC: 2351033. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7042.1333.


Comparison of stimulable phosphor technology and conventional screen-film technology in pediatric scoliosis.

Stringer D, Cairns R, Poskitt K, Bray H, Milner R, Kennedy B Pediatr Radiol. 1994; 24(1):1-5.

PMID: 8008484 DOI: 10.1007/BF02017647.