A Prospective Study of Direct-acting Antiviral Effectiveness and Relapse Risk in HCV Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis by the Italian PITER Cohort
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background And Aims: Mixed cryoglobulinemia is the most common HCV extrahepatic manifestation. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV) clinical profile after a sustained virologic response (SVR) over a medium-term to long-term period.
Approach And Results: Direct-acting antiviral-treated cryoglobulinemic patients, consecutively enrolled in the multicentric Italian Platform for the Study of Viral Hepatitis Therapy cohort, were prospectively evaluated. Cumulative incidence Kaplan-Meier curves were reported for response, clinical deterioration, relapse and relapse-free survival rates. Cox regression analysis evaluated factors associated with different outcomes. A clinical response was reported in at least one follow-up point for 373 of 423 (88%) patients with CV who achieved SVR. Clinical response increased over time with a 76% improvement rate at month 12 after the end of treatment. A full complete response (FCR) was reached by 164 (38.8%) patients in at least one follow-up point. CV clinical response fluctuated, with some deterioration of the initial response in 49.6% of patients (median time of deterioration, 19 months). In patients who achieved FCR and had an available follow-up (137 patients) a relapse was observed in 13% and it was transient in 66.7% of patients. The rate of patients without any deterioration was 58% and 41% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. After achieving SVR, a clinical nonresponse was associated with older age and renal involvement; a clinical deterioration/relapse was associated with high pretreatment rheumatoid factor values, and FCR was inversely associated with age, neuropathy, and high cryocrit levels.
Conclusion: In patients with CV, HCV eradication may not correspond to a persistent clinical improvement, and clinical response may fluctuate. This implies an attentive approach to post-SVR evaluation through prognostic factors and tailored treatment.
Shweikeh F, Torres Y, Khan K, Mouchli M, Singh I Immunol Res. 2025; 73(1):55.
PMID: 39979644 DOI: 10.1007/s12026-025-09608-7.
Mennini F, Sciattella P, Simonelli C, Marcellusi A, Rosato S, Kondili L J Viral Hepat. 2025; 32(2):e14061.
PMID: 39868676 PMC: 11771735. DOI: 10.1111/jvh.14061.
Morrone A, Fiorilli V, Cinti L, Roberto P, Ferri A, Visentini M Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1411146.
PMID: 39055707 PMC: 11269149. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1411146.
Han H, Su W, Tian X, Zhou D, Li J, Cao X Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024; 19(1):185.
PMID: 38698461 PMC: 11067141. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03159-0.
Mendez-Sanchez N, Coronel-Castillo C, Ramirez-Mejia M Pathogens. 2024; 13(4).
PMID: 38668294 PMC: 11053783. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13040339.