» Articles » PMID: 34902160

Molecular Imaging in Oncology: Current Impact and Future Directions

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Dec 13
PMID 34902160
Citations 67
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The authors define molecular imaging, according to the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, as the visualization, characterization, and measurement of biological processes at the molecular and cellular levels in humans and other living systems. Although practiced for many years clinically in nuclear medicine, expansion to other imaging modalities began roughly 25 years ago and has accelerated since. That acceleration derives from the continual appearance of new and highly relevant animal models of human disease, increasingly sensitive imaging devices, high-throughput methods to discover and optimize affinity agents to key cellular targets, new ways to manipulate genetic material, and expanded use of cloud computing. Greater interest by scientists in allied fields, such as chemistry, biomedical engineering, and immunology, as well as increased attention by the pharmaceutical industry, have likewise contributed to the boom in activity in recent years. Whereas researchers and clinicians have applied molecular imaging to a variety of physiologic processes and disease states, here, the authors focus on oncology, arguably where it has made its greatest impact. The main purpose of imaging in oncology is early detection to enable interception if not prevention of full-blown disease, such as the appearance of metastases. Because biochemical changes occur before changes in anatomy, molecular imaging-particularly when combined with liquid biopsy for screening purposes-promises especially early localization of disease for optimum management. Here, the authors introduce the ways and indications in which molecular imaging can be undertaken, the tools used and under development, and near-term challenges and opportunities in oncology.

Citing Articles

Deep learning in nuclear medicine: from imaging to therapy.

Zhang M, Liu P, Zhang M, Su P, Shang H, Zhu J Ann Nucl Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40080372 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-025-02031-w.


Advancements in molecular imaging probes for precision diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.

Fang J, Alhaskawi A, Dong Y, Cheng C, Xu Z, Tian J J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2025; 26(2):124-144.

PMID: 40015933 PMC: 11867783. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B2300614.


Clinical benefits of LAFOV PET/CT in growing demand for molecular imaging.

Vogel W, Steemers-de Boer M, Jansen S, Rijkhorst E, de Wit-van der Veen B, van der Hiel B Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025; .

PMID: 40014073 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07159-5.


Impact of biocontainment on small animal PET performance adapted for BSL-2/3 infectious disease imaging research.

Salerno I, Benabdallah N, Fears A, Unnerstall R, Hauck L, Komarov S EJNMMI Res. 2025; 15(1):14.

PMID: 39984776 PMC: 11845635. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-025-01202-0.


Mapping the landscape and research trend of imaging diagnosis in lymphoma: a bibliometric analysis from 1976 to 2024.

Ma Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 12:1516817.

PMID: 39944492 PMC: 11813927. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1516817.


References
1.
Newman J, Francis I, Kaminski M, Wahl R . Imaging of lymphoma with PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: correlation with CT. Radiology. 1994; 190(1):111-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.190.1.8259386. View

2.
Cookson M, Aus G, Burnett A, Canby-Hagino E, DAmico A, Dmochowski R . Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in.... J Urol. 2007; 177(2):540-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.097. View

3.
Gorin M, Rowe S, Baras A, Solnes L, Ball M, Pierorazio P . Prospective Evaluation of (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for the Diagnosis of Renal Oncocytomas and Hybrid Oncocytic/Chromophobe Tumors. Eur Urol. 2015; 69(3):413-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.056. View

4.
Savir-Baruch B, Zanoni L, Schuster D . Imaging of Prostate Cancer Using Fluciclovine. PET Clin. 2017; 12(2):145-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2016.11.005. View

5.
Hope T, Calais J, Zhang L, Dieckmann W, Millo C . In-Pentetreotide Scintigraphy Versus Ga-DOTATATE PET: Impact on Krenning Scores and Effect of Tumor Burden. J Nucl Med. 2019; 60(9):1266-1269. PMC: 6735279. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.223016. View