6.
Persson M, Skovgaard D, Brandt-Larsen M, Christensen C, Madsen J, Nielsen C
. First-in-human uPAR PET: Imaging of Cancer Aggressiveness. Theranostics. 2015; 5(12):1303-16.
PMC: 4615734.
DOI: 10.7150/thno.12956.
View
7.
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R
. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2008; 45(2):228-47.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
View
8.
Dong S, Wang Y, Liu Z, Zhang W, Yi K, Zhang X
. Beehive-Inspired Macroporous SERS Probe for Cancer Detection through Capturing and Analyzing Exosomes in Plasma. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020; 12(4):5136-5146.
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b21333.
View
9.
Gondoputro W, Scheltema M, Blazevski A, Doan P, Thompson J, Amin A
. Robot-Assisted Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Radioguided Surgery in Primary Diagnosed Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2022; 63(11):1659-1664.
PMC: 9635675.
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263743.
View
10.
Combes A, Palma C, Calopedos R, Wen L, Woo H, Fulham M
. PSMA PET-CT in the Diagnosis and Staging of Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(11).
PMC: 9689635.
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112594.
View
11.
Schottelius M, Wurzer A, Wissmiller K, Beck R, Koch M, Gorpas D
. Synthesis and Preclinical Characterization of the PSMA-Targeted Hybrid Tracer PSMA-I&F for Nuclear and Fluorescence Imaging of Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2018; 60(1):71-78.
PMC: 6354225.
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.212720.
View
12.
Rathkopf D, Morris M, Fox J, Danila D, Slovin S, Hager J
. Phase I study of ARN-509, a novel antiandrogen, in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(28):3525-30.
PMC: 3782148.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.1684.
View
13.
You H, Shang W, Min X, Weinreb J, Li Q, Leapman M
. Sight and switch off: Nerve density visualization for interventions targeting nerves in prostate cancer. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(6):eaax6040.
PMC: 7002130.
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax6040.
View
14.
Hong S, Sun Y, Tang C, Cheng K, Zhang R, Fan Q
. Chelator-Free and Biocompatible Melanin Nanoplatform with Facile-Loading Gadolinium and Copper-64 for Bioimaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2017; 28(7):1925-1930.
DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00245.
View
15.
Dorfinger J, Ponholzer A, Stolzlechner M, Lenart S, Baltzer P, Toepker M
. MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy of the prostate compared to systematic prostate biopsy - Effectiveness and accuracy of a combined approach in daily clinical practice. Eur J Radiol. 2022; 154:110432.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110432.
View
16.
Basu S, Hess S, Nielsen Braad P, Olsen B, Inglev S, Hoilund-Carlsen P
. The Basic Principles of FDG-PET/CT Imaging. PET Clin. 2015; 9(4):355-70, v.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2014.07.006.
View
17.
Sodee D, Malguria N, Faulhaber P, Resnick M, Albert J, Bakale G
. Multicenter ProstaScint imaging findings in 2154 patients with prostate cancer. The ProstaScint Imaging Centers. Urology. 2000; 56(6):988-93.
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00824-4.
View
18.
Effert P, Beniers A, Tamimi Y, Handt S, Jakse G
. Expression of glucose transporter 1 (Glut-1) in cell lines and clinical specimens from human prostate adenocarcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2004; 24(5A):3057-63.
View
19.
Varnosfaderani Z, Emamzadeh R, Nazari M, Zarean M
. Detection of a prostate cancer cell line using a bioluminescent affiprobe: An attempt to develop a new molecular probe for ex vivo studies. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019; 138:755-763.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.085.
View
20.
Sathianathen N, Butaney M, Konety B
. The utility of PET-based imaging for prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2018; 37(7):1239-1249.
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2403-7.
View