» Articles » PMID: 34899913

Effect of Chemical Challenges on the Properties of Composite Resins

Overview
Journal Int J Dent
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Dec 13
PMID 34899913
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the chemical degradation effect on microhardness and roughness of composite resins after aging.

Materials And Methods: Specimens ( = 10) were used for Filtek Z350 XT (Z350), Filtek Bulk Fill (BULK), Micerium HRI (HRI), Micerium BIOFUNCION (BIO), and Vittra APS (VITTRA). Microhardness and roughness were performed before and after degradation with the followed solutions: citric acid, phosphoric acid, 75% alcohol, and distilled water. Samples were to a 180-day chemical cycling protocol. After degradation, one sample of each group was selected for scanning electron microscope evaluation. The data were analyzed with normal distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov) and similarities of variations for the Bartlett test. ANOVA (two-way) followed by Tukey's test was performed considering treatment and composite resin ( < 0.05).

Results: For microhardness and roughness, variations were noted to different solution and resin formulations. Z350 and HRI showed higher microhardness percentage loss, and it was more evident after storage in alcohol (-48.49 ± 20.16 and -25.02 ± 14.04, respectively) and citric acid (-65.05 ± 28.97 and 16.12 ± 8.35, respectively). For roughness, Z350 and VITTRA showed less delta values after alcohol storage (-0.047 ± 0.007 and -0.022 ± 0.009, respectively). HRI had the worst roughness for citric acid (-0.090 ± 0.025). All resins were not statistically different between each other in water and phosphoric acid.

Conclusion: The formulations of restorative resin materials influenced in degree of surface degradation after 180 days of chemical degradation. Water was considered the solution that causes less degradation for microhardness and roughness evaluations. For microhardness, alcohol was considered the worst solution for Z350 and HRI. For superficial roughness, Z350 and VITTRA showed less degradation in alcohol and citric and phosphoric acid solutions.

Citing Articles

evaluation of the effect of two pediatric syrups on the microhardness and surface roughness of restoration materials.

Padilla-Caceres T, Arbildo-Vega H, Mamani-Cori V, Caballero-Apaza L, Casa-Coila M J Clin Exp Dent. 2024; 16(9):e1098-e1102.

PMID: 39399847 PMC: 11470455. DOI: 10.4317/jced.62029.


Influence of different finishing, aging with coffee, and repolishing protocols on the properties of nanoparticle composite resins.

Vargas R, Machado A, da Silva G, Miranda A, Campolina M, Santos-Filho P J Clin Exp Dent. 2024; 16(6):e724-e732.

PMID: 39130361 PMC: 11310979. DOI: 10.4317/jced.61653.


The effect of detox solution on color stability, roughness, and microhardness of monochromatic universal composite resins.

Nezir M, Ahisha C, Ozcan S, Uctasli M BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):789.

PMID: 39003474 PMC: 11246577. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04587-x.


The Effect of Food-Simulating Liquids on Surface Features of Single-Shade Universal Composites: An Study.

Alp C, Arslandas Dincturk B, Altinisik H J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2023; 13(2):157-165.

PMID: 37223442 PMC: 10202257. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_233_22.


Assessment of Micro-Hardness, Degree of Conversion, and Flexural Strength for Single-Shade Universal Resin Composites.

Yilmaz Atali P, Dogu Kaya B, Manav Ozen A, Tarcin B, Senol A, Tuter Bayraktar E Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(22).

PMID: 36433113 PMC: 9697557. DOI: 10.3390/polym14224987.


References
1.
Ruttermann S, Kruger S, Raab W, Janda R . Polymerization shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion of contemporary posterior resin-based filling materials--a comparative study. J Dent. 2007; 35(10):806-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.014. View

2.
Maran B, de Geus J, Gutierrez M, Heintze S, Tardem C, Barceleiro M . Nanofilled/nanohybrid and hybrid resin-based composite in patients with direct restorations in posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2020; 99:103407. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103407. View

3.
Fugolin A, de Paula A, Dobson A, Huynh V, Consani R, Ferracane J . Alternative monomer for BisGMA-free resin composites formulations. Dent Mater. 2020; 36(7):884-892. PMC: 7305961. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.04.009. View

4.
Goncalves F, Pfeifer C, Stansbury J, Newman S, Braga R . Influence of matrix composition on polymerization stress development of experimental composites. Dent Mater. 2010; 26(7):697-703. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.014. View

5.
Al-Ahdal K, Silikas N, Watts D . Rheological properties of resin composites according to variations in composition and temperature. Dent Mater. 2014; 30(5):517-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.005. View