» Articles » PMID: 34895357

Integrating PrEP Delivery in Public Health Family Planning Clinics: a Protocol for a Pragmatic Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial in Kenya

Abstract

Background: Adolescent girls and young women account for a disproportionate fraction of new HIV infections in Africa and are a priority population for HIV prevention, including provision of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Anchoring PrEP delivery to care settings like family planning (FP) services that women already access routinely may offer an efficient platform to reach HIV at-risk women. However, context-specific implementation science evaluation is needed.

Methods: The Family Planning Plus Project is a prospective, pragmatic implementation evaluation, designed as a stepped wedge, cluster randomized trial, at 12 clinics in Kenya. In collaboration with the Kenya Ministry of Health and Kisumu County Department of Health, we will introduce integration of HIV risk screening and PrEP delivery in public health FP clinics. The core multifaceted implementation strategies to integrate PrEP in FP clinics will include: (1) PrEP delivery by existing FP clinic staff, (2) health provider training, (3) PrEP technical assistance to coach and mentor providers, (4) joint supervision with Kisumu County health officials, and (5) stakeholder engagement. All core components of PrEP delivery-including screening for HIV risk, HIV testing, dispensing, adherence and risk reduction counseling, assessment of side effects, and provision of refills, or safety assessment-will be conducted by existing FP clinic staff as part of a standard care service package. The goal is to catalyze sustainable scale-up within existing infrastructures beyond the project. We will rigorously evaluate implementation outcomes and impact, using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework, and we will use Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science Research (CFIR) to assess readiness to implement and contextual enablers and barriers of implementation, including how clinics innovate efficient delivery systems.

Discussion: Anchoring PrEP delivery to existing FP systems and staffing has tremendous potential to address barriers that women face in accessing HIV prevention and PrEP care, including lack of time, cost, and stigma of visiting a facility solely for HIV prevention. The FP Plus Project will initiate preparation for full-scale and sustainable model of integration of comprehensive HIV prevention services, including PrEP implementation, in public health FP clinics in low-income settings. Trial registration Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on December 14, 2020: NCT04666792.

Citing Articles

Integration of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) services for pregnant and breastfeeding women in eight primary care clinics: results of an implementation science study.

Nelson A, Bheemraj K, Dean S, de Voux A, Hlatshwayo L, Mvududu R Res Sq. 2023; .

PMID: 38045335 PMC: 10690321. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3648622/v1.


Factors associated with retention on pre-exposure prophylaxis among female sex workers in Kigali, Rwanda.

Mubezi S, Rwibasira G, Uwineza J, Kayisinga J, Wandera M, Malamba S PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(11):e0002524.

PMID: 37930984 PMC: 10627470. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002524.


Preparing for long-acting PrEP delivery: building on lessons from oral PrEP.

Celum C, Grinsztejn B, Ngure K J Int AIDS Soc. 2023; 26 Suppl 2:e26103.

PMID: 37439077 PMC: 10339005. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26103.


Patterns of PrEP continuation and coverage in the first year of use: a latent class analysis of a programmatic PrEP trial in Kenya.

Mugwanya K, Palayew A, Schaafsma T, Irungu E, Bukusi E, Mugo N J Int AIDS Soc. 2023; 26(7):e26137.

PMID: 37403405 PMC: 10320042. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26137.

References
1.
Donnell D, Baeten J, Bumpus N, Brantley J, Bangsberg D, Haberer J . HIV protective efficacy and correlates of tenofovir blood concentrations in a clinical trial of PrEP for HIV prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014; 66(3):340-8. PMC: 4059553. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000172. View

2.
Hsieh H, Shannon S . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687. View

3.
Hemming K, Eldridge S, Forbes G, Weijer C, Taljaard M . How to design efficient cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2017; 358:j3064. PMC: 5508848. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j3064. View

4.
Ngure K, Heffron R, Curran K, Vusha S, Ngutu M, Mugo N . I Knew I Would Be Safer. Experiences of Kenyan HIV Serodiscordant Couples Soon After Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Initiation. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016; 30(2):78-83. PMC: 4753630. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2015.0259. View

5.
Vindrola-Padros C, Johnson G . Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature. Qual Health Res. 2020; 30(10):1596-1604. DOI: 10.1177/1049732320921835. View