» Articles » PMID: 34894002

Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Multiple Nucleos(t)ide Analogues Treatment Failure Hepatitis B: Is Monotherapy Enough?

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2021 Dec 11
PMID 34894002
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aim: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a first-line treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection for its high potency and a low rate of drug resistance. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of TDF in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection after treatment failure with multiple nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs).

Methods: Patients included were aged 18-65 years, with treatment failure with multiple NAs (serum HBV DNA > 200 IU/mL after more than two different NA treatments). The primary endpoint was proportion of patients with serum HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL at Week 144 of TDF monotherapy. Secondary endpoints and safety were also assessed.

Results: Overall, 213 patients were enrolled. At Week 144, mean HBV DNA decreased significantly from baseline (4.4 vs 1.4 log IU/mL), with 77.0% patients (95% confidence interval: 71.1, 82.9) achieving serum HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL. Three (1.4%) patients experienced virological breakthrough during TDF monotherapy, without hepatitis flare. At Week 144, 15.3% and 4.7% patients (hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-positive at baseline) experienced HBeAg loss and HBeAg seroconversion, respectively; 68.3% patients achieved normalized alanine aminotransferase levels. Overall, 58.7% patients experienced more than one adverse event (AE). Most common AEs were upper respiratory tract infection and blood creatine phosphokinase increase; 8.5% patients experienced study drug-related AEs; 9.4% patients experienced serious AEs (none were TDF-related). Among renal safety parameters, overall trend of mean serum phosphorous level remained stable, while mean estimated glomerular filtration rate increased slightly.

Conclusions: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy is efficacious in CHB patients with multiple NAs treatment failure with no new safety findings.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic effectiveness analysis of tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on the treatment for chronic hepatitis B.

Liu R, Qiao J, Zhang L, Dou Z Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(20):e37953.

PMID: 38758884 PMC: 11098221. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037953.


Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for multiple nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment failure hepatitis B: Is monotherapy enough?.

Liang X, Xie Q, Shang J, Tang H, Xu M, Meng Q J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 37(3):471-479.

PMID: 34894002 PMC: 9303406. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15757.

References
1.
Sarin S, Kumar M, Lau G, Abbas Z, Chan H, Chen C . Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update. Hepatol Int. 2015; 10(1):1-98. PMC: 4722087. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-015-9675-4. View

2.
Patterson S, George J, Strasser S, Lee A, Sievert W, Nicoll A . Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate rescue therapy following failure of both lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil in chronic hepatitis B. Gut. 2010; 60(2):247-54. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2010.223206. View

3.
Lim Y, Gwak G, Choi J, Lee Y, Byun K, Kim Y . Monotherapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for adefovir-resistant vs. entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B: A 5-year clinical trial. J Hepatol. 2019; 71(1):35-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.021. View

4.
Kim Y, Sinn D, Gwak G, Choi M, Koh K, Paik S . Tenofovir rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients after multiple treatment failures. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 18(47):6996-7002. PMC: 3531685. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i47.6996. View

5.
Chung G, Cho E, Lee J, Yoo J, Lee M, Cho Y . Tenofovir has inferior efficacy in adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients compared to nucleos(t)ide-naïve patients. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2017; 23(1):66-73. PMC: 5381841. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2016.0060. View