» Articles » PMID: 3489068

Selective Depressant Action of Antidromic Impulses on Gustatory Nerve Signals

Overview
Journal J Gen Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1986 Aug 1
PMID 3489068
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The depressant action of antidromic volleys of impulses on gustatory nerve signals from the tongues of bullfrogs was studied. Electrical stimulation of the glossopharyngeal nerve at a rate of 100 Hz for 10 s and at supramaximal intensity slightly depressed the integrated glossopharyngeal nerve responses to quinine and to mechanical taps to the tongue. The same antidromic stimuli resulted in a 30-40% reduction in the responses to salt, acid, water, and warmed saline, but depressed greater than 80% of the afferent impulses firing spontaneously. The magnitude of responses to quinine and NaCl and the number of spontaneous discharges decreased gradually with an increase in either the frequency or the duration of antidromic stimuli. Similar results were obtained with intensities above the threshold for exciting gustatory and slowly adapting mechanosensitive fibers. The time required to recover from termination of the antidromic stimuli to two-thirds of the maximal amount of depression ranged between 6 and 7 min, with no significant differences among the depressions. The possible mechanisms involved in the antidromic depression of gustatory nerve signals are discussed.

Citing Articles

Enhancement of Gustatory Neural Responses by Parasympathetic Nerve in the Frog.

Sato T, Okada Y Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2017; 38(4):883-890.

PMID: 29103093 PMC: 11481864. DOI: 10.1007/s10571-017-0562-5.


Interaction among different sensory units within a single fungiform papilla in the frog tongue.

Murayama N J Gen Physiol. 1988; 91(5):685-701.

PMID: 3262148 PMC: 2216153. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.91.5.685.

References
1.
Yamashita S . CHEMORECEPTOR RESPONSE IN FROG, AS MODIFIED BY TEMPERATURE CHANGE. Jpn J Physiol. 1964; 14:488-504. DOI: 10.2170/jjphysiol.14.488. View

2.
DeHan R, Graziadei P . Functional anatomy of frog's taste organs. Experientia. 1971; 27(7):823-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF02136888. View

3.
Murayama N, Ishiko N . Effect of antidromic stimulation of the glossopharyngeal nerve on afferent discharges occurring with and without sensory stimulation of the frog tongue. Neurosci Lett. 1985; 60(1):95-9. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(85)90387-8. View

4.
Ishiko N, Hanamori T, Murayama N . Frog's tongue receptive areas: neural organization and gustatory function. Experientia. 1979; 35(6):773-4. DOI: 10.1007/BF01968239. View

5.
Akaike N, Noma A, Sato M . Electrical responses to frog taste cells to chemical stimuli. J Physiol. 1976; 254(1):87-107. PMC: 1309182. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011223. View