» Articles » PMID: 34887956

Angiography-guided Mid/high Septal Implantation of Ventricular Leads in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease

Overview
Journal J Arrhythm
Publisher Wiley
Date 2021 Dec 10
PMID 34887956
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Conduction system pacing prevents pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, but it can be challenging to perform in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), and mid/high septal lead implantation is an alternative. This study aimed to assess intraprocedural angiography's utility as a guide for mid/high-septal lead implantation in CHD patients.

Methods: The study subjects were CHD patients with Class I/IIa indications for permanent pacemaker implantation. To guide septal lead implantation, we performed an intraprocedural right ventricular angiogram in anteroposterior, 40° left anterior oblique, and 30° right anterior oblique. The primary endpoint was the lead tip in the mid/high septum on computed tomography (CT). The secondary endpoints were complications and systemic ventricular function on follow-up.

Results: From January 2008 to December 2018, we enrolled 27 patients (mean age: 30 ± 20 years; M:F 17:10) with CHD (unoperated: 20, operated: 7). The mean paced QRS duration was 131.7 ± 5.8 ms, and CT done in 22/27 patients confirmed the lead tip in the mid-septum in 16, high septum in 5, and apical septum in 1 patient. There were no procedural complications, and during a mean follow-up of 58 ± 35.2 months, there was no significant change in the systemic ventricular ejection fraction (56.4 ± 8.3% vs 53.9 + 5.9%,  = .08). Two patients with Eisenmenger syndrome died because of refractory heart failure.

Conclusions: Intraprocedural angiography is safe and useful to guide mid/high-septal lead implantation in CHD patients. Mid/high septal lead position preserves systemic ventricular function in patients with CHD during medium-term follow-up.

Citing Articles

Angiography-guided mid/high septal implantation of ventricular leads in patients with congenital heart disease.

Shenthar J, Valappil S, Rai M, Banavalikar B, Padmanabhan D, Delhaas T J Arrhythm. 2021; 37(6):1512-1521.

PMID: 34887956 PMC: 8637100. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12636.

References
1.
Khairy P, Van Hare G, Balaji S, Berul C, Cecchin F, Cohen M . PACES/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on the Recognition and Management of Arrhythmias in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: developed in partnership between the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) and the Heart Rhythm Society.... Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11(10):e102-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.05.009. View

2.
Karpawich P, Rabah R, Haas J . Altered cardiac histology following apical right ventricular pacing in patients with congenital atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999; 22(9):1372-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00631.x. View

3.
Shenthar J, Rai M, Delhaas T . Transvenous pacing in complex post-operative congenital heart disease guided by angiography: A case report. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2018; 19(1):30-33. PMC: 6354208. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2018.11.005. View

4.
Thambo J, Bordachar P, Garrigue S, Lafitte S, Sanders P, Reuter S . Detrimental ventricular remodeling in patients with congenital complete heart block and chronic right ventricular apical pacing. Circulation. 2004; 110(25):3766-72. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000150336.86033.8D. View

5.
Chen D, Wei H, Tang J, Liu L, Wu S, Lin C . A randomized comparison of fluoroscopic techniques for implanting pacemaker lead on the right ventricular outflow tract septum. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 32(5):721-8. PMC: 4853443. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-0840-1. View