» Articles » PMID: 34873056

Predicting Patient Response with Models Trained on Cell Lines and Patient-derived Xenografts by Nonlinear Transfer Learning

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Dec 7
PMID 34873056
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Preclinical models have been the workhorse of cancer research, producing massive amounts of drug response data. Unfortunately, translating response biomarkers derived from these datasets to human tumors has proven to be particularly challenging. To address this challenge, we developed TRANSACT, a computational framework that builds a consensus space to capture biological processes common to preclinical models and human tumors and exploits this space to construct drug response predictors that robustly transfer from preclinical models to human tumors. TRANSACT performs favorably compared to four competing approaches, including two deep learning approaches, on a set of 23 drug prediction challenges on The Cancer Genome Atlas and 226 metastatic tumors from the Hartwig Medical Foundation. We demonstrate that response predictions deliver a robust performance for a number of therapies of high clinical importance: platinum-based chemotherapies, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel. In contrast to other approaches, we demonstrate the interpretability of the TRANSACT predictors by correctly identifying known biomarkers of targeted therapies, and we propose potential mechanisms that mediate the resistance to two chemotherapeutic agents.

Citing Articles

Towards an interpretable deep learning model of cancer.

Nilsson A, Meimetis N, Lauffenburger D NPJ Precis Oncol. 2025; 9(1):46.

PMID: 39948231 PMC: 11825879. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-025-00822-y.


Best holdout assessment is sufficient for cancer transcriptomic model selection.

Crawford J, Chikina M, Greene C Patterns (N Y). 2025; 5(12):101115.

PMID: 39776849 PMC: 11701843. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.101115.


Two-Step Transfer Learning Improves Deep Learning-Based Drug Response Prediction in Small Datasets: A Case Study of Glioblastoma.

Ju J, Ntafoulis I, Klein M, Jt Reinders M, Lamfers M, Stubbs A Bioinform Biol Insights. 2025; 19:11779322241301507.

PMID: 39763506 PMC: 11700395. DOI: 10.1177/11779322241301507.


Machine learning of brain-specific biomarkers from EEG.

Bomatter P, Paillard J, Garces P, Hipp J, Engemann D EBioMedicine. 2024; 106:105259.

PMID: 39106531 PMC: 11347073. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105259.


Investigating the effects of artificial intelligence on the personalization of breast cancer management: a systematic study.

Sohrabei S, Moghaddasi H, Hosseini A, Ehsanzadeh S BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):852.

PMID: 39026174 PMC: 11256548. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12575-1.


References
1.
Ali M, Aittokallio T . Machine learning and feature selection for drug response prediction in precision oncology applications. Biophys Rev. 2018; 11(1):31-39. PMC: 6381361. DOI: 10.1007/s12551-018-0446-z. View

2.
Goldstein L . MDR1 gene expression in solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 1996; 32A(6):1039-50. DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)00100-1. View

3.
Wang B, Mezlini A, Demir F, Fiume M, Tu Z, Brudno M . Similarity network fusion for aggregating data types on a genomic scale. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(3):333-7. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2810. View

4.
Robinson M, Oshlack A . A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2010; 11(3):R25. PMC: 2864565. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25. View

5.
Dobin A, Davis C, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S . STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2012; 29(1):15-21. PMC: 3530905. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. View