» Articles » PMID: 34871884

Opportunities and Challenges for the Application of Post-consumer Plastic Waste Pyrolysis Oils As Steam Cracker Feedstocks: To Decontaminate or Not to Decontaminate?

Overview
Journal Waste Manag
Date 2021 Dec 6
PMID 34871884
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Thermochemical recycling of plastic waste to base chemicals via pyrolysis followed by a minimal amount of upgrading and steam cracking is expected to be the dominant chemical recycling technology in the coming decade. However, there are substantial safety and operational risks when using plastic waste pyrolysis oils instead of conventional fossil-based feedstocks. This is due to the fact that plastic waste pyrolysis oils contain a vast amount of contaminants which are the main drivers for corrosion, fouling and downstream catalyst poisoning in industrial steam cracking plants. Contaminants are therefore crucial to evaluate the steam cracking feasibility of these alternative feedstocks. Indeed, current plastic waste pyrolysis oils exceed typical feedstock specifications for numerous known contaminants, e.g. nitrogen (∼1650 vs. 100 ppm max.), oxygen (∼1250 vs. 100 ppm max.), chlorine (∼1460vs. 3 ppm max.), iron (∼33 vs. 0.001 ppm max.), sodium (∼0.8 vs. 0.125 ppm max.)and calcium (∼17vs. 0.5 ppm max.). Pyrolysis oils produced from post-consumer plastic waste can only meet the current specifications set for industrial steam cracker feedstocks if they are upgraded, with hydrogen based technologies being the most effective, in combination with an effective pre-treatment of the plastic waste such as dehalogenation. Moreover, steam crackers are reliant on a stable and predictable feedstock quality and quantity representing a challenge with plastic waste being largely influenced by consumer behavior, seasonal changes and local sorting efficiencies. Nevertheless, with standardization of sorting plants this is expected to become less problematic in the coming decade.

Citing Articles

Advancing Textile Waste Recycling: Challenges and Opportunities Across Polymer and Non-Polymer Fiber Types.

Seifali Abbas-Abadi M, Tomme B, Goshayeshi B, Mynko O, Wang Y, Roy S Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40076120 PMC: 11902667. DOI: 10.3390/polym17050628.


Plastic Devolatilisation Kinetics During Isothermal High-Temperature Pyrolysis: Focus on Solid Products (Part I).

Kiminaite I, Wilhelm S, Martetschlager L, Eckert C, Berenguer Casco M, Striugas N Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40006187 PMC: 11859507. DOI: 10.3390/polym17040525.


Untangling the chemical complexity of plastics to improve life cycle outcomes.

Law K, Sobkowicz M, Shaver M, Hahn M Nat Rev Mater. 2024; 9(9):657-667.

PMID: 39430229 PMC: 11483869. DOI: 10.1038/s41578-024-00705-x.


Chemical Recycling of Mixed Polyolefin Post-Consumer Plastic Waste Sorting Residues (MPO323)-Auto-Catalytic Reforming and Decontamination with Pyrolysis Char as an Active Material.

Rieger T, Nieberl M, Palchyk V, Shah P, Fehn T, Hofmann A Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(18).

PMID: 39339031 PMC: 11435146. DOI: 10.3390/polym16182567.


Influence of Feedstock Particle Size on the Certain Determination of Chlorine and Bromine in Pyrolysis Oils from Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Plastics.

Perez-Martinez B, Lopez-Urionabarrenechea A, Serras-Malillos A, Acha E, Caballero B, Asueta A ACS Omega. 2024; 9(30):32593-32603.

PMID: 39100313 PMC: 11292639. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c01415.


References
1.
Zushi Y, Hashimoto S, Tamada M, Masunaga S, Kanai Y, Tanabe K . Retrospective analysis by data processing tools for comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to high resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry: a challenge for matrix-rich sediment core sample from Tokyo Bay. J Chromatogr A. 2014; 1338:117-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.02.015. View

2.
Brandao G, de Campos R, Luna A, de Castro E, de Jesus H . Determination of arsenic in diesel, gasoline and naphtha by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry using microemulsion medium for sample stabilization. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2006; 385(8):1562-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-006-0585-0. View

3.
Van Geem K, Pyl S, Reyniers M, Vercammen J, Beens J, Marin G . On-line analysis of complex hydrocarbon mixtures using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2010; 1217(43):6623-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.04.006. View

4.
Herrera M, Matuschek G, Kettrup A . Main products and kinetics of the thermal degradation of polyamides. Chemosphere. 2001; 42(5-7):601-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(00)00233-2. View

5.
Nicolotti L, Cordero C, Bressanello D, Cagliero C, Liberto E, Magagna F . Parallel dual secondary column-dual detection: a further way of enhancing the informative potential of two-dimensional comprehensive gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2014; 1360:264-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.07.081. View