» Articles » PMID: 34869434

Comparison of Cricothyroid Membrane Puncture Anesthesia and Topical Anesthesia for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Dec 6
PMID 34869434
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) is commonly used for patients with a difficult airway. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cricothyroid membrane puncture anesthesia and topical anesthesia during AFOI. A total of 70 patients (the American Society of Anesthesiologists score I-III) with anticipated difficult airways scheduled for nonemergency surgery with AFOI were randomly slated to receive cricothyroid membrane puncture anesthesia ( = 35) or topical anesthesia ( = 35). Each group received dexmedetomidine at a dose of 1.0 μg/kg and sufentanil at a dose of 0.2 μg/kg over 10 min for conscious sedation before intubation. The endoscopy intubation, post-intubation condition, and endoscopy tolerance as scored by the anesthetists were observed. The satisfaction of the operator regarding the procedure and the satisfaction of the patient 24 h after the surgery were also recorded. We recorded the success rate of the first intubation, intubation time, and hemodynamic changes during the procedure and also the adverse events. Better intubation scores, operator satisfaction, and satisfaction of the patient were observed in the cricothyroid membrane puncture anesthesia group than in the topical anesthesia group ( < 0.05). The intubation time in the cricothyroid membrane puncture anesthesia group was less than that in the topical anesthesia group ( < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the patient tolerance scores, the success rate of the first intubation, hemodynamic changes, and adverse events between both the groups. Compared with topical anesthesia, cricothyroid membrane puncture anesthesia provided better intubation conditions and less intubation time with greater satisfaction of the patient and operator during endoscopic intubation. URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=42636, Identifier: ChiCTR 1900025820.

Citing Articles

Modified anterior approach versus traditional posterior approach for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake endotracheal intubation: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial.

Huang Q, Hua Y, Zhou R, Chen G, Zhu T Ann Med. 2023; 55(2):2264856.

PMID: 37813093 PMC: 10563619. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2264856.

References
1.
Lallo A, Billard V, Bourgain J . A comparison of propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusions to facilitate fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2009; 108(3):852-7. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318184eb31. View

2.
Stamenkovic D, Hassid M . Dexmedetomidine for fiberoptic intubation of a patient with severe mental retardation and atlantoaxial instability. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006; 50(10):1314-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01157.x. View

3.
Ebert T, Hall J, BARNEY J, Uhrich T, Colinco M . The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. Anesthesiology. 2000; 93(2):382-94. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200008000-00016. View

4.
Andruszkiewicz P, Dec M, Kanski A, Becler R . Awake fibreoptic intubation. Anestezjol Intens Ter. 2011; 42(4):218-21. View

5.
Wang H, Tang S, Wang X, Gong W, Liu X, Lei W . Doxapram hastens the recovery following total intravenous anesthesia with dexmedetomidine, propofol and remifentanil. Exp Ther Med. 2015; 9(4):1518-1522. PMC: 4353763. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2015.2249. View