Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Sufentanil for Conscious Sedation in Patients Undergoing Awake Fibreoptic Nasotracheal Intubation: a Prospective, Randomised and Controlled Clinical Trial
Overview
Affiliations
Introduction: Fibreoptic intubation is a valuable technique for difficult airway management in which conscious sedation is paramount.
Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine (DEX) and sufentanil (SUF) for conscious sedation during awake nasotracheal intubation under vision by a fibreoptic bronchoscope.
Methods: Forty patients with anticipated difficult airways of American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II scheduled for awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation were randomised into two groups each containing 20 subjects. DEX group received DEX at a dose of 1.0 μg/kg over 10 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 μg/kg per hour, while SUF group received SUF target controlled infusion in which the target plasma concentration was 0.3 ng/mL. The nasotracheal intubation conditions and the tolerance to nasotracheal intubation were observed; the occurrence of adverse events including hypertension, bradycardia and respiratory depression during nasotracheal intubation and post-surgical throat pain and hoarseness, and post-surgical memory score were recorded.
Results: Better nasotracheal intubation conditions and higher tolerance to intubation were observed in DEX group than those in SUF group (P < 0.05). The incidence rates of hypertension, respiratory depression during intubation and throat pain after surgery were lower in DEX group than those in SUF group; however, the incidence of bradycardia was higher in DEX group than that in SUF group.
Conclusions: DEX provides better nasotracheal intubation conditions, improves patients' tolerance to intubation and leads to lower occurrence of hypertension, respiratory depression and throat pain and post-surgical memory score for sedation during awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation.
Sedation for awake tracheal intubation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
El-Boghdadly K, Desai N, Jones J, Elghazali S, Ahmad I, Sneyd J Anaesthesia. 2024; 80(1):74-84.
PMID: 39468765 PMC: 11617133. DOI: 10.1111/anae.16452.
Arora S, Govardhane B, Srinivasan V, Karandikar G Indian J Anaesth. 2024; 68(5):447-453.
PMID: 38764966 PMC: 11100653. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_1004_23.
Wang S, Hu C, Zhang T, Zhao X, Li C Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:743009.
PMID: 34869434 PMC: 8635047. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.743009.
Liu Y, Ai D, Wang X J Int Med Res. 2021; 49(5):3000605211017686.
PMID: 34044638 PMC: 8165843. DOI: 10.1177/03000605211017686.
Yadav U, Yadav J, Srivastava D, Srivastava S Anesth Essays Res. 2021; 14(2):271-276.
PMID: 33487828 PMC: 7819408. DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_44_20.