» Articles » PMID: 34868432

Design of a Tennis-Specific Agility Test (TAT) for Monitoring Tennis Players

Overview
Journal J Hum Kinet
Publisher Termedia
Date 2021 Dec 6
PMID 34868432
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Agility is an important ability for tennis players. To be successful in the rallies, players must perform rapid, multidirectional movements in response to the ball and/or the position of the opponent. For a test to be representative in monitoring agility performance, it should capture a combination of the physical and cognitive agility performance. Considering that literature reports no reliable and valid sport-specific agility test for tennis, the aim of this article was to design and evaluate the measurement properties of a Tennis-specific Agility Test (TAT). To evaluate the TAT, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and feasibility were assessed. For reproducibility, a two-way mixed ANOVA was performed. Concurrent validity was assessed using Pearson correlations. A total of 69 tennis players participated in this study of whom 16 competed at the international (22 ± 3.7 years, playing level (Dynamic Rating System): .8 ± .3), 43 at the national (14 ± 1.4 years, playing level: 4.6 ± 1.4), and 10 at the regional level (15 ± 0.8 years, playing level: 4.9 ± 1.1). Test-retest reliability was found to be moderate with an Intra-Class Correlation coefficient (ICC) of .74 (p < .01) and a percentual minimal detectable change (%MDC) of 6.2%. Concurrent validity was found to be moderate by comparison with a recognised agility test, the Spider Drill, which measures only the physical component (.70; p < .01), and by comparison with tennis performance for both boys (r = .67; p < .01) and girls (r = .72; p < .01). The feasibility was high with short time for preparation (five to ten minutes) and time per participant (<5 minutes). In conclusion, the TAT shows promising results for assessing sport-specific agility performance in tennis making it likely to be used in the practical setting.

Citing Articles

Optimizing Agility and Athletic Proficiency in Badminton Athletes Through Plyometric Training: A Review.

Shedge S, Ramteke S, Jaiswal P Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e52596.

PMID: 38374840 PMC: 10875150. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52596.


The influence of age and sex on speed-strength performance in children between 10 and 14 years of age.

Warneke K, Wagner C, Konrad A, Kadlubowski B, Sander A, Wirth K Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1092874.

PMID: 36895629 PMC: 9989187. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1092874.


Development and trainability of agility in youth: A systematic scoping review.

Thieschafer L, Busch D Front Sports Act Living. 2022; 4:952779.

PMID: 36157901 PMC: 9496649. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.952779.


Design and Validation of a New Tennis-Specific Reactive Agility Test-A Pilot Study.

Munivrana G, Jelaska I, Tomljanovic M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(16).

PMID: 36011674 PMC: 9408533. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610039.

References
1.
Young W, McDowell M, Scarlett B . Specificity of sprint and agility training methods. J Strength Cond Res. 2001; 15(3):315-9. View

2.
Hornery D, Farrow D, Mujika I, Young W . An integrated physiological and performance profile of professional tennis. Br J Sports Med. 2007; 41(8):531-6. PMC: 2465445. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.031351. View

3.
de Franca Bahia Loureiro Jr L, Costa Dias M, Cremasco F, da Silva M, de Freitas P . Assessment of Specificity of the Badcamp Agility test for Badminton Players. J Hum Kinet. 2017; 57:191-198. PMC: 5504591. DOI: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0060. View

4.
Sheppard J, Young W . Agility literature review: classifications, training and testing. J Sports Sci. 2006; 24(9):919-32. DOI: 10.1080/02640410500457109. View

5.
Paul D, Gabbett T, Nassis G . Agility in Team Sports: Testing, Training and Factors Affecting Performance. Sports Med. 2015; 46(3):421-42. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-015-0428-2. View