» Articles » PMID: 28713471

Assessment of Specificity of the Badcamp Agility Test for Badminton Players

Overview
Journal J Hum Kinet
Publisher Termedia
Date 2017 Jul 18
PMID 28713471
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Badcamp agility test was created to evaluate agility of badminton players. The Badcamp is a valid and reliable test, however, a doubt about the need for the use of this test exists as simpler tests could provide similar information about agility in badminton players. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the specificity of the Badcamp, comparing the performance of badminton players and athletes from other sports in the Badcamp and the shuttle run agility test (SRAT). Sixty-four young male and female athletes aged between 14 and 16 years participated in the study. They were divided into 4 groups of 16 according to their sport practices: badminton, tennis, team sport (basketball and volleyball), and track and field. We compared the groups in both tests, the Badcamp and SRAT. The results revealed that the group of badminton players was faster compared to all other groups in the Badcamp. However, in the SRAT there were no differences among groups composed of athletes from open skill sports (e.g., badminton, tennis, and team sports), and a considerable reduction of the difference between badminton players and track and field athletes. Thus, we concluded that the Badcamp test is a specific agility test for badminton players and should be considered in evaluating athletes of this sport modality.

Citing Articles

Improving Special Ability Performance of Badminton Players through a Visual Reaction Training System.

Kuo K, Liao C, Kao C Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(8).

PMID: 36011111 PMC: 9407790. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10081454.


Analysis of Winning Experience and Technical Training Effect of Badminton Match Based on BP Neural Network.

Song H J Healthc Eng. 2022; 2022:5295881.

PMID: 35237393 PMC: 8885290. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5295881.


Design of a Tennis-Specific Agility Test (TAT) for Monitoring Tennis Players.

Jansen M, Elferink-Gemser M, Hoekstra A, Faber I, Huijgen B J Hum Kinet. 2021; 80:239-250.

PMID: 34868432 PMC: 8607759. DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2021-0094.

References
1.
Mikolajec K, Maszczyk A, Zajac T . Game Indicators Determining Sports Performance in the NBA. J Hum Kinet. 2013; 37:145-51. PMC: 3796832. DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2013-0035. View

2.
de Franca Bahia Loureiro Jr L, de Freitas P . Development of an Agility Test for Badminton Players and Assessment of Its Validity and Test-Retest Reliability. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015; 11(3):305-10. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0189. View

3.
Sheppard J, Young W, Doyle T, Sheppard T, Newton R . An evaluation of a new test of reactive agility and its relationship to sprint speed and change of direction speed. J Sci Med Sport. 2006; 9(4):342-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.019. View

4.
Sporis G, Jukic I, Milanovic L, Vucetic V . Reliability and factorial validity of agility tests for soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 24(3):679-86. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c4d324. View

5.
Kida N, Oda S, Matsumura M . Intensive baseball practice improves the Go/Nogo reaction time, but not the simple reaction time. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005; 22(2):257-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.003. View