» Articles » PMID: 34850902

Maternal-Offspring Interactions: Reciprocally Coevolving Social Environments

Overview
Journal J Hered
Specialty Genetics
Date 2021 Dec 1
PMID 34850902
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Maternal-zygotic co-evolution is one of the most common examples of indirect genetic effects. I investigate how maternal-zygotic gene interactions affect rates of evolution and adaptation. Using comparably parameterized population genetic models, I compare evolution to an abiotic environment with genotype-by-environment interaction (G × E) to evolution to a maternal environment with offspring genotype-by-maternal environment interaction (G × Gmaternal). There are strong parallels between the 2 models in the components of fitness variance but they differ in their rates of evolution measured in terms of ∆p, gene frequency change, or of ∆W, change in mean fitness. The Price Equation is used to partition ∆W into 2 components, one owing to the genetic variance in fitness by natural selection and a second owing to change in environment. Adaptive evolution is faster in the 2-locus model with G × Gmaternal with free recombination, than it is in the 1-locus model with G × E, because in the former the maternal genetic environment coevolves with the zygotic phenotype adapting to it. I discuss the relevance of these findings for the evolution of genes with indirect genetic effects.

Citing Articles

When is Offspring Viability Fitness a Measure of Paternal Fitness and When is it not?.

Fitzpatrick C, Wade M J Hered. 2021; 113(1):48-53.

PMID: 34850026 PMC: 8851674. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esab055.


Indirect Genetic Effects: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on Empirical Studies.

Baud A, McPeek S, Chen N, Hughes K J Hered. 2021; 113(1):1-15.

PMID: 34643239 PMC: 8851665. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esab059.

References
1.
Frank S . Natural selection. IV. The Price equation. J Evol Biol. 2012; 25(6):1002-19. PMC: 3354028. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02498.x. View

2.
Wolf J, Brodie Iii E, Cheverud J, Moore A, Wade M . Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 13(2):64-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01233-0. View

3.
Cruickshank T, Wade M . Microevolutionary support for a developmental hourglass: gene expression patterns shape sequence variation and divergence in Drosophila. Evol Dev. 2008; 10(5):583-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00273.x. View

4.
Fitzpatrick C, Wade M . When is Offspring Viability Fitness a Measure of Paternal Fitness and When is it not?. J Hered. 2021; 113(1):48-53. PMC: 8851674. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esab055. View

5.
Breen M, Kemena C, Vlasov P, Notredame C, Kondrashov F . Epistasis as the primary factor in molecular evolution. Nature. 2012; 490(7421):535-8. DOI: 10.1038/nature11510. View