Sexual Selection: Harem Size and the Variance in Male Reproductive Success
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Sexual selection is potentially stronger than natural selection when the variance in male reproductive fitness exceeds all other components of fitness variance combined. However, measuring the variance in male reproductive fitness is difficult when nonmating males are absent, inconspicuous, or otherwise difficult to find. Omitting the nonmating males inflates estimates of average male reproductive success and diminishes the variance, leading to underestimates of the potential strength of sexual selection. We show that, in theory, the proportion of the total variance in male fitness owing to sexual selection is approximately equal to H, the mean harem size, as long as H is large and females are randomly distributed across mating males (i.e., Vharem=H). In this case, mean harem size not only provides an easy way to estimate the potential strength of sexual selection but also equals the opportunity for sexual selection, I(mates). In nature, however, females may be overdispersed with Vharem<H or more aggregated than random with Vharem>H. We show that H+(k-1) is a good measure of the opportunity for sexual selection, where k is the ratio Vharem/H. A review of mating system data reveals that in nature the median ratio for Vharem/H is 1.04, but as H increases, females tend to become more aggregated across mating males with V(harem) two to three times larger than H.
Barber R, Yang J, Yang C, Barker O, Janicke T, Tobias J PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(11):e3002856.
PMID: 39495808 PMC: 11567637. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002856.
Genetic variants underlying human bisexual behavior are reproductively advantageous.
Song S, Zhang J Sci Adv. 2024; 10(1):eadj6958.
PMID: 38170769 PMC: 10796114. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adj6958.
Sexual selection in seaweed? Testing Bateman's principles in the red alga .
Lavaut E, Valero M, Mauger S, Guillemin M, Destombe C, Dufay M Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2006):20231668.
PMID: 37700657 PMC: 10498045. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1668.
de la Pena E, Perez-Gonzalez J, Martin J, Vedel G, Carranza J BMC Zool. 2023; 6(1):18.
PMID: 37170131 PMC: 10127101. DOI: 10.1186/s40850-021-00083-9.
Beltran D, Araya-Salas M, Parra J, Stiles F, Rico-Guevara A Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1989):20221783.
PMID: 36515116 PMC: 9748779. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1783.