» Articles » PMID: 34841445

Nomogram for Predicting Postoperative Cancer-specific Early Death in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Based on the SEER Database: a Large Cohort Study

Overview
Date 2021 Nov 29
PMID 34841445
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Ovarian cancer is a common gynecological malignant tumor. Poor prognosis is strongly associated with early death, but there is no effective tool to predict this. This study aimed to construct a nomogram for predicting cancer-specific early death in patients with ovarian cancer.

Methods: We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database of patients with ovarian cancer registered from 1988 to 2016. Important independent prognostic factors were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression and LASSO Cox regression. Several risk factors were considered in constructing the nomogram. Nomogram discrimination and calibration were evaluated using C-index, internal validation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: A total of 4769 patients were included. Patients were assigned to the training set (n = 3340; 70%) and validation set (n = 1429; 30%). Based on the training set, eight variables were shown to be significant factors for early death and were incorporated in the nomogram: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, residual lesion size, chemotherapy, serum CA125 level, tumor size, number of lymph nodes examined, surgery of primary site, and age. The concordance indices and ROC curves showed that the nomogram had better predictive ability than the AJCC staging system and good clinical practicability. Internal validation based on validation set showed good consistency between predicted and observed values for early death.

Conclusion: Compared with predictions made based on AJCC stage or residual lesion size, the nomogram could provide more robust predictions for early death in patients with ovarian cancer.

Citing Articles

Pan-immune-inflammation value: a new prognostic index in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Liao W, Li J, Feng W, Kong W, Shen Y, Chen Z BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1052.

PMID: 39187781 PMC: 11345988. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12809-2.


Nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Cheng H, Xu J, Kang X, Wu C, Tang X, Chen M J Ovarian Res. 2023; 16(1):75.

PMID: 37059991 PMC: 10103408. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01144-y.


A Machine Learning Approach Using XGBoost Predicts Lung Metastasis in Patients with Ovarian Cancer.

Yuan Y, Wang R, Luo M, Zhang Y, Guo F, Bai G Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:8501819.

PMID: 36277898 PMC: 9581702. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8501819.

References
1.
Sehouli J, Grabowski J . Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2020; 125 Suppl 24:4598-4601. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32511. View

2.
Doherty J, Peres L, Wang C, Way G, Greene C, Schildkraut J . Challenges and Opportunities in Studying the Epidemiology of Ovarian Cancer Subtypes. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2017; 4(3):211-220. PMC: 5718213. DOI: 10.1007/s40471-017-0115-y. View

3.
Horvath L, Werner T, Boucher K, Jones K . The relationship between tumor size and stage in early versus advanced ovarian cancer. Med Hypotheses. 2013; 80(5):684-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.01.027. View

4.
Wang X, Mao M, Xu G, Lin F, Sun P, Baklaushev V . The incidence, associated factors, and predictive nomogram for early death in stage IV colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019; 34(7):1189-1201. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03306-1. View

5.
Torre L, Trabert B, DeSantis C, Miller K, Samimi G, Runowicz C . Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(4):284-296. PMC: 6621554. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21456. View