» Articles » PMID: 22750127

Stage at Diagnosis and Ovarian Cancer Survival: Evidence from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership

Abstract

Objective: We investigate what role stage at diagnosis bears in international differences in ovarian cancer survival.

Methods: Data from population-based cancer registries in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, and the UK were analysed for 20,073 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer during 2004-07. We compare the stage distribution between countries and estimate stage-specific one-year net survival and the excess hazard up to 18 months after diagnosis, using flexible parametric models on the log cumulative excess hazard scale.

Results: One-year survival was 69% in the UK, 72% in Denmark and 74-75% elsewhere. In Denmark, 74% of patients were diagnosed with FIGO stages III-IV disease, compared to 60-70% elsewhere. International differences in survival were evident at each stage of disease; women in the UK had lower survival than in the other four countries for patients with FIGO stages III-IV disease (61.4% vs. 65.8-74.4%). International differences were widest for older women and for those with advanced stage or with no stage data.

Conclusion: Differences in stage at diagnosis partly explain international variation in ovarian cancer survival, and a more adverse stage distribution contributes to comparatively low survival in Denmark. This could arise because of differences in tumour biology, staging procedures or diagnostic delay. Differences in survival also exist within each stage, as illustrated by lower survival for advanced disease in the UK, suggesting unequal access to optimal treatment. Population-based data on cancer survival by stage are vital for cancer surveillance, and global consensus is needed to make stage data in cancer registries more consistent.

Citing Articles

Knowledge mapping and visualization of trends in immunotherapy for ovarian cancer over the past five years: a bibliometric analysis.

Shaie K, Sihan L, Yuli W, Mengfei H, Renqian F, Yan H Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1465917.

PMID: 39421747 PMC: 11483997. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1465917.


Association of human papillomavirus 16 and 18 with ovarian cancer risk: Insights from a meta‑analysis.

Le T, Nguyen H, Cho J, Park N, Han H, Chong G Oncol Lett. 2024; 28(6):556.

PMID: 39355783 PMC: 11443309. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14689.


Construction of scalable multi-channel DNA nanoplatform for the combined detection of ctDNA biomarkers of ovarian cancer.

Song Y, Jin X, Zhao Y, Cheng S, Xu S, Bu S Mikrochim Acta. 2024; 191(9):553.

PMID: 39167246 DOI: 10.1007/s00604-024-06632-6.


Symptom burden, palliative care knowledge, and palliative care needs in advanced gynecological cancer patients in Korea.

Ko E, Lee Y Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(9):582.

PMID: 39126487 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08772-0.


Examining the impact of age on chemotherapy completion in epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer: a retrospective cohort study in Thailand.

Assavapokee N, Santibenchakul S, Ratree S, Lertkhachonsuk R, Phoolcharoen N BMJ Open. 2024; 14(7):e083270.

PMID: 39025817 PMC: 11261680. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083270.