» Articles » PMID: 34829824

Comparable Efficacy in Ischemic and Non-Ischemic ICD Recipients for the Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2021 Nov 27
PMID 34829824
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

(1) Background: In patients suffering from heart failure, the main causes of death are either hemodynamic failure, or ventricular arrhythmias. The only tool to significantly reduce arrhythmic sudden death is the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), but not all patients benefit to the same extent from these devices. (2) Methods: The primary outcome of this single-center study was defined as cardiovascular death in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure who have benefited from ICD therapy. The secondary outcomes were death from any cause, sudden cardiac death, ICD-related therapies (appropriate antitachycardia pacing or shock therapy for ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation) and recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. (3) Results: A total of 403 consecutive ICD recipients-symptomatic heart failure patients with ICD for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death-were included retrospectively: 59% ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) and 41% non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP) patients. Within a median follow-up period of 36 months, the incidence of cardiovascular mortality was not significantly different in patients with NICMP and ICMP: the primary outcome had occurred in 9 patients (5.4%) in the NICMP group and in 14 patients (5.9%) in the ICMP group (hazard ratio 1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 2.28; = 0.97). All-cause mortality occurred in 14 of 166 patients (8.4%) in the NICMP group and 18 of 237 patients (7.6%) in the ICMP group. Sudden cardiac death occurred in two patients (1.2%) in the NICMP group and in four patients (1.7%) in the ICMP group (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI, 0.13 to 3.88; = 0.69). The rate of appropriate device therapies was comparable in both groups. (4) Conclusions: In this study, ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure was associated with similar rates of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease, and in patients with heart failure from other causes. NICMP and ICMP showed comparable rates of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies.

Citing Articles

Optimal Timing of Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Ursaru A, Costache I, Petris A, Haba M, Mitu O, Crisan A Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 23(4):124.

PMID: 39076214 PMC: 11273764. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2304124.


Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Primary and Secondary Prevention of SCD-What We Still Don't Know.

Ursaru A, Petris A, Costache I, Nicolae A, Crisan A, Tesloianu N J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022; 9(4).

PMID: 35448096 PMC: 9028370. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9040120.

References
1.
Poole J, Olshansky B, Mark D, Anderson J, Johnson G, Hellkamp A . Long-Term Outcomes of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in the SCD-HeFT. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76(4):405-415. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.061. View

2.
Hallstrom A, Greene H, Wyse D, Zipes D, EPSTEIN A, Domanski M . Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID)--rationale, design, and methods. Am J Cardiol. 1995; 75(7):470-5. View

3.
Desai A, Fang J, Maisel W, Baughman K . Implantable defibrillators for the prevention of mortality in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2004; 292(23):2874-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.23.2874. View

4.
Bardy G, Lee K, Mark D, Poole J, Packer D, Boineau R . Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(3):225-37. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa043399. View

5.
Moss A, Zareba W, Hall W, Klein H, Wilber D, Cannom D . Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(12):877-83. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa013474. View