» Articles » PMID: 34829011

The Individual Differences in the Perception of Oral Chemesthesis Are Linked to Taste Sensitivity

Overview
Journal Foods
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2021 Nov 27
PMID 34829011
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chemesthesis is a part of the flavor experience of foods. Chemesthetic perception is studied to understand its effect on food-related behavior and health. Thus, the objective of this research was to study individual differences in chemesthetic perception. Our study involved sensory tests of three chemesthetic modalities (astringency, pungency, and cooling). Participants ( = 196) evaluated the intensity of samples in different concentrations using a line scale under sensory laboratory conditions. Aluminum ammonium sulfate, capsaicin, and menthol were used as the prototypic chemesthetic compounds. The participants were divided into sensitivity groups in different chemesthetic modalities by hierarchical clustering based on their intensity ratings. In addition, an oral chemesthesis sensitivity score was determined to represent the generalized chemesthesis sensitivity. The results showed that people can perceive chemesthesis on different intensity levels. There were significantly positive correlations between (1) sensitivity scores for oral chemesthesis and taste as well as (2) each chemesthesis and taste modalities. Moreover, based on the multinomial logistic regression model, significant interactions between oral chemesthesis and taste sensitivity were discovered. Our findings showed that people can be classified into different oral chemesthesis sensitivity groups. The methods and results of this study can be utilized to investigate associations with food-related behavior and health.

Citing Articles

Factors explaining individual differences in the oral perception of capsaicin, l-menthol, and aluminum ammonium sulfate.

Roukka S, Puputti S, Aisala H, Hoppu U, Seppa L, Sandell M Clin Transl Sci. 2023; 16(10):1815-1827.

PMID: 37424404 PMC: 10582669. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13587.


TDS Similarity: Outlier Analysis Using a Similarity Index to Compare Time-Series Responses of Temporal Dominance of Sensations Tasks.

Natsume H, Okamoto S, Nagano H Foods. 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37238843 PMC: 10217113. DOI: 10.3390/foods12102025.


A Simple Taste Test for Clinical Assessment of Taste and Oral Somatosensory Function-The "Seven-iTT".

Mastinu M, Pieniak M, Wolf A, Green T, Hahner A, Niv M Life (Basel). 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36676008 PMC: 9865728. DOI: 10.3390/life13010059.

References
1.
Kolkka-Palomaa M, Jaaskelainen S, Laine M, Teerijoki-Oksa T, Sandell M, Forssell H . Pathophysiology of primary burning mouth syndrome with special focus on taste dysfunction: a review. Oral Dis. 2015; 21(8):937-48. DOI: 10.1111/odi.12345. View

2.
PELEG H, Bodine K, Noble A . The influence of acid on astringency of alum and phenolic compounds. Chem Senses. 1998; 23(3):371-8. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/23.3.371. View

3.
Arellano-Covarrubias A, Gomez-Corona C, Varela P, Escalona-Buendia H . Connecting flavors in social media: A cross cultural study with beer pairing. Food Res Int. 2019; 115:303-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.12.004. View

4.
Laaksonen O, Ahola J, Sandell M . Explaining and predicting individually experienced liking of berry fractions by the hTAS2R38 taste receptor genotype. Appetite. 2012; 61(1):85-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.10.023. View

5.
Rhyu M, Kim Y, Lyall V . Interactions between Chemesthesis and Taste: Role of TRPA1 and TRPV1. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(7). PMC: 8038011. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073360. View