» Articles » PMID: 34827951

Protein Supplementation and Grazing Behavior for Cows on Differing Late-Season Rangeland Grazing Systems

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2021 Nov 27
PMID 34827951
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective was to determine if low- or high-residual feed intake (LRFI or HRFI, = 24 for each) Hereford × Angus cows on continuously or rotationally grazed rangeland altered their grazing behavior when provided a protein supplement in late autumn. Treatments included continuously grazed, control (CCON, = 12); continuously grazed, supplemented (CTRT, = 12); rotationally grazed, control (RCON, = 12); and rotationally grazed, supplemented pastures (RTRT, = 12). Cows in each treatment had grazing time (GT), resting time (RT), and walking time (WLK) measured for 2 years with accelerometers. Bite rate (BR) was also measured. Time distributions of GT and RT differed by year ( < 0.05), being influenced by colder temperatures in 2016. Cattle in 2016 spent more time grazing during early morning and late evening ( < 0.05) and rested more during the day ( < 0.05). In 2017, cattle in the CCON treatment walked more ( < 0.05) during early morning time periods than did the CTRT cattle, indicative of search grazing. All supplemented cattle had greater BR ( < 0.05) than control cattle in 2017. Cattle with increased nutritional demands alter grazing behavior in a compensatory fashion when grazing late-season rangelands.

Citing Articles

Intensively Reared Nelore Steers with Levels of Concentrate and Protein Sources during the Dry Season.

Faria A, Bolson D, Pina D, Prado T, Roecker A, Chaves C Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 38929406 PMC: 11201241. DOI: 10.3390/ani14121787.


Feeding behavior of post-weaned crossbred steers supplemented in the dry season of the year.

Lins T, Silva R, Mendes F, da Silva F, Bastos E, Paixao T Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022; 54(4):203.

PMID: 35676383 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-022-03209-4.


ASAS-NANP Symposium: Mathematical Modeling in Animal Nutrition: Opportunities and challenges of confined and extensive precision livestock production.

Menendez H, Brennan J, Gaillard C, Ehlert K, Quintana J, Neethirajan S J Anim Sci. 2022; 100(6).

PMID: 35511692 PMC: 9171331. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac160.

References
1.
Sprinkle J, Holloway J, Warrington B, Ellist W, Stuth J, Forbes T . Digesta kinetics, energy intake, grazing behavior, and body temperature of grazing beef cattle differing in adaptation to heat. J Anim Sci. 2000; 78(6):1608-24. DOI: 10.2527/2000.7861608x. View

2.
Lahart B, Prendiville R, Buckley F, Kennedy E, Conroy S, Boland T . The repeatability of feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle offered high-concentrate, grass silage and pasture-based diets. Animal. 2020; 14(11):2288-2297. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731120000853. View

3.
Meyer A, Kerley M, Kallenbach R . The effect of residual feed intake classification on forage intake by grazing beef cows. J Anim Sci. 2008; 86(10):2670-9. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0642. View

4.
Barton R, Krysl L, Judkins M, Holcombe D, Broesder J, Gunter S . Time of daily supplementation for steers grazing dormant intermediate wheatgrass pasture. J Anim Sci. 1992; 70(2):547-58. DOI: 10.2527/1992.702547x. View

5.
Sprinkle J, Sagers J, Hall J, Ellison M, Yelich J, Brennan J . Grazing behavior and production for cattle on differing late-season rangeland grazing systems with or without protein supplementation. Transl Anim Sci. 2020; 3(Suppl 1):1792-1796. PMC: 6999180. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txz100. View