» Articles » PMID: 31820799

Grazing Behavior and Production Characteristics Among Cows Differing in Residual Feed Intake While Grazing Late Season Idaho Rangeland

Overview
Journal J Anim Sci
Date 2019 Dec 11
PMID 31820799
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objectives were to determine whether cows previously classified during a postweaning test as either low or high residual feed intake (LRFI or HRFI) differed in BW, BCS, and winter grazing activity while consuming poor-quality forage. Thirty Hereford × Angus (LRFI = 16; HRFI = 14) 2-yr-old mid- to late-gestation cows (pregnant with second calf) grazed sagebrush steppe for 78 d beginning 29 September 2015. BW and BCS were collected before and after grazing. Five cows of each RFI classification were fitted with global positioning system (GPS) collars on 16 November 2015 with data collection commencing 3 d later and continuing for 25 d in a 323-ha pasture. The GPS units collected location coordinates every 2 min from which total daily travel distance (DTD) was calculated. Visual counts for bite rate were obtained from collared cows over 8 d. Coordinate data, daily bite rate, BW, and BCS were analyzed as repeated measures using a mixed model, which included RFI group, day, and RFI group × day as fixed effects and cow within RFI group as the random effect. Change in BW and BCS was analyzed by ANOVA with RFI group as the main effect. Cow BCS and BW differed for both day (P < 0.0001) and day × RFI (P < 0.05). Body condition was less (P < 0.05) in LRFI cows at the beginning (5.8 ± 0.13 vs. 6.2 ± 0.14 BCS), but similar (P = 0.67) to HRFI at the end of the study (4.6 ± 0.13 vs. 4.6 ± 0.14). BW among the RFI groups did not differ (P = 0.20) prior to going to range. However, BW-change and BCS-change differed (P < 0.05) between RFI groups. Not only did the LRFI cows lose less BW (-50.0 ± 5.41 kg vs. -66.6 ± 5.78 kg) over the trial, they also were less variable with respect to BW loss. Cows did not differ (P > 0.21) by RFI for DTD or bite rate, but day was significant (P < 0.0001) with cows increasing bite rate as the season of year progressed (55.2 ± 5.63 bites/min for day 4 vs. 84.8 ± 5.32 bites/min for day 21) and increasing DTD as snow storms occurred. Although LRFI cows were leaner than HRFI cows at the commencement of the project, they lost less BW in a late season rangeland environment.

Citing Articles

Energy efficiency of grazing Hereford heifers classified by paternal residual feed intake.

Marin M, Naya H, Espasandin A, Navajas E, Devincenzi T, Carriquiry M Transl Anim Sci. 2024; 8:txae005.

PMID: 38525300 PMC: 10960596. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txae005.


Characterization of grazing behaviour microstructure using point-of-view cameras.

Sales-Baptista E, Ferraz-de-Oliveira M, Terra-Braga M, de Castro J, Serrano J, dAbreu M PLoS One. 2022; 17(3):e0265037.

PMID: 35302988 PMC: 8932577. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265037.


Protein Supplementation and Grazing Behavior for Cows on Differing Late-Season Rangeland Grazing Systems.

Sprinkle J, Sagers J, Hall J, Ellison M, Yelich J, Brennan J Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(11).

PMID: 34827951 PMC: 8614474. DOI: 10.3390/ani11113219.


Impacts of heifer postweaning residual feed intake classification on reproductive and performance measurements of first-, second-, and third-parity Angus beef females.

Parsons C, Dafoe J, Wyffels S, Van Emon M, DelCurto T, Boss D Transl Anim Sci. 2021; 5(2):txab061.

PMID: 34386712 PMC: 8355441. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txab061.


Influence of Residual Feed Intake and Cow Age on Dry Matter Intake Post-Weaning and Peak Lactation of Black Angus Cows.

Parsons C, Dafoe J, Wyffels S, DelCurto T, Boss D Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(6).

PMID: 34207267 PMC: 8234949. DOI: 10.3390/ani11061822.


References
1.
Golden J, Kerley M, Kolath W . The relationship of feeding behavior to residual feed intake in crossbred Angus steers fed traditional and no-roughage diets. J Anim Sci. 2007; 86(1):180-6. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2005-569. View

2.
Ferrell C, Jenkins T . Energy utilization by mature, nonpregnant, nonlactating cows of different types. J Anim Sci. 1984; 58(1):234-43. DOI: 10.2527/jas1984.581234x. View

3.
Leng R . Factors affecting the utilization of 'poor-quality' forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutr Res Rev. 2008; 3(1):277-303. DOI: 10.1079/NRR19900016. View

4.
Sprinkle J, Holloway J, Warrington B, Ellist W, Stuth J, Forbes T . Digesta kinetics, energy intake, grazing behavior, and body temperature of grazing beef cattle differing in adaptation to heat. J Anim Sci. 2000; 78(6):1608-24. DOI: 10.2527/2000.7861608x. View

5.
Meyer A, Kerley M, Kallenbach R . The effect of residual feed intake classification on forage intake by grazing beef cows. J Anim Sci. 2008; 86(10):2670-9. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0642. View