» Articles » PMID: 34823593

Disentangling Environmental Effects in Microbial Association Networks

Overview
Journal Microbiome
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Genetics
Microbiology
Date 2021 Nov 26
PMID 34823593
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ecological interactions among microorganisms are fundamental for ecosystem function, yet they are mostly unknown or poorly understood. High-throughput-omics can indicate microbial interactions through associations across time and space, which can be represented as association networks. Associations could result from either ecological interactions between microorganisms, or from environmental selection, where the association is environmentally driven. Therefore, before downstream analysis and interpretation, we need to distinguish the nature of the association, particularly if it is due to environmental selection or not.

Results: We present EnDED (environmentally driven edge detection), an implementation of four approaches as well as their combination to predict which links between microorganisms in an association network are environmentally driven. The four approaches are sign pattern, overlap, interaction information, and data processing inequality. We tested EnDED on networks from simulated data of 50 microorganisms. The networks contained on average 50 nodes and 1087 edges, of which 60 were true interactions but 1026 false associations (i.e., environmentally driven or due to chance). Applying each method individually, we detected a moderate to high number of environmentally driven edges-87% sign pattern and overlap, 67% interaction information, and 44% data processing inequality. Combining these methods in an intersection approach resulted in retaining more interactions, both true and false (32% of environmentally driven associations). After validation with the simulated datasets, we applied EnDED on a marine microbial network inferred from 10 years of monthly observations of microbial-plankton abundance. The intersection combination predicted that 8.3% of the associations were environmentally driven, while individual methods predicted 24.8% (data processing inequality), 25.7% (interaction information), and up to 84.6% (sign pattern as well as overlap). The fraction of environmentally driven edges among negative microbial associations in the real network increased rapidly with the number of environmental factors.

Conclusions: To reach accurate hypotheses about ecological interactions, it is important to determine, quantify, and remove environmentally driven associations in marine microbial association networks. For that, EnDED offers up to four individual methods as well as their combination. However, especially for the intersection combination, we suggest using EnDED with other strategies to reduce the number of false associations and consequently the number of potential interaction hypotheses. Video abstract.

Citing Articles

Time of first contact determines cooperator success in a three-member microbial consortium.

Los R, Fecker T, van Touw P, van Tatenhove-Pel R, Idema T ISME Commun. 2025; 5(1):ycaf004.

PMID: 40041704 PMC: 11879117. DOI: 10.1093/ismeco/ycaf004.


Enhancing microbial predator-prey detection with network and trait-based analyses.

Martinez Rendon C, Braun C, Kappelsberger M, Boy J, Casanova-Katny A, Glaser K Microbiome. 2025; 13(1):37.

PMID: 39905550 PMC: 11792678. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-025-02035-8.


Networks as tools for defining emergent properties of microbiomes and their stability.

Kajihara K, Hynson N Microbiome. 2024; 12(1):184.

PMID: 39342398 PMC: 11439251. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-024-01868-z.


Systematic Evaluation of Biotic and Abiotic Factors in Antifungal Microorganism Screening.

Gupta G, Labrie S, Filteau M Microorganisms. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39065164 PMC: 11279232. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12071396.


Synthetic Microbial Community Promotes Bacterial Communities Leading to Soil Multifunctionality in Desertified Land.

Hao X, Gu Y, Zhang H, Wang X, Liu X, Chen C Microorganisms. 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 38930499 PMC: 11205429. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12061117.


References
1.
Yang Y, Chen N, Chen T . Inference of Environmental Factor-Microbe and Microbe-Microbe Associations from Metagenomic Data Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Statistical Model. Cell Syst. 2017; 4(1):129-137.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.12.012. View

2.
Faust K, Sathirapongsasuti J, Izard J, Segata N, Gevers D, Raes J . Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012; 8(7):e1002606. PMC: 3395616. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002606. View

3.
Villaverde A, Becker K, Banga J . PREMER: A Tool to Infer Biological Networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2017; 15(4):1193-1202. DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2017.2758786. View

4.
Fernandes A, Gloor G . Mutual information is critically dependent on prior assumptions: would the correct estimate of mutual information please identify itself?. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(9):1135-9. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq111. View

5.
Falkowski P, Fenchel T, DeLong E . The microbial engines that drive Earth's biogeochemical cycles. Science. 2008; 320(5879):1034-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1153213. View