» Articles » PMID: 34805629

Catheter Port Reversal in Citrate Continuous Veno-Venous Hemofiltration

Overview
Journal Kidney Int Rep
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2021 Nov 22
PMID 34805629
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Knowledge of effects of catheter port reversal (CathPR), when blood is withdrawn from the venous port and returned via the arterial port, often used in dysfunctional catheters in renal replacement therapy, is limited in the setting of citrate continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH).

Methods: In this open trial, post-filter ionized calcium (PfiCa), post-filter citrate concentration (PfCC), catheter recirculation, and solute clearance were measured before, during, and after 6 hours of CathPR, in well-functioning catheters. All other settings, including citrate settings, were left constant during the study.

Results: Twenty-three patients were included. Mean PfiCa before CathPR of 0.36 mmol/L (SD 0.06) decreased to 0.31 (0.04) after 2 hours ( = 0.002), 0.31 (0.04) ( = 0.002) at 4 hours, and 0.31 (0.04) at 6 hours ( = 0.001). Return to normal increased mean PfiCa to 0.34 (0.06) ( = 0.006). Mean PfCC rose from 592 mg/L (SD 164) before CathPR to 649 mg/L (190) after 2 hours ( = 0.045), to 696 mg/L (192) after 4 hours ( < 0.001), and to 657 mg/L (214) after 6 hours ( = 0.018). Return to normal decreased mean PfCC to 598 mg/L (184) ( = 0.024). Mean recirculation increased during CathPR (from 4.3% [0-8.7] before to 13.8% [9.7-22.2],  < 0.001). Urea, potassium, and creatinine clearances dropped significantly, but calcium clearance was unaffected.

Conclusion: CathPR caused a significant decrease in PfiCA and increase in PfCC. Calcium handling differs from other solutes because of increases caused in citrate concentration and subsequent effects on calcium chelation. In citrate CVVH, CathPR in dysfunctional catheters should be limited in time, with intensive follow-up. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT024600416. Registered 9 November 2015.

Citing Articles

Different distances between central venous catheter tips can affect antibiotic clearance during continuous renal replacement therapy.

Bandert A, Lipcsey M, Frithiof R, Larsson A, Smekal D Intensive Care Med Exp. 2024; 12(1):56.

PMID: 38913212 PMC: 11196527. DOI: 10.1186/s40635-024-00635-6.


In an endotoxaemic model, antibiotic clearance can be affected by different central venous catheter positions, during renal replacement therapy.

Bandert A, Lipcsey M, Frithiof R, Larsson A, Smekal D Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023; 11(1):32.

PMID: 37291474 PMC: 10250278. DOI: 10.1186/s40635-023-00516-4.

References
1.
Koirala N, Anvari E, McLennan G . Monitoring and Surveillance of Hemodialysis Access. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2016; 33(1):25-30. PMC: 4806702. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1572548. View

2.
Depner T, Krivitski N, MacGibbon D . Hemodialysis access recirculation measured by ultrasound dilution. ASAIO J. 1995; 41(3):M749-53. DOI: 10.1097/00002480-199507000-00113. View

3.
Sherman R . The measurement of dialysis access recirculation. Am J Kidney Dis. 1993; 22(4):616-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80940-1. View

4.
Pannu N, Jhangri G, Tonelli M . Optimizing dialysis delivery in tunneled dialysis catheters. ASAIO J. 2006; 52(2):157-62. DOI: 10.1097/01.mat.0000202081.13974.39. View

5.
Degraeve A, Danse E, Laterre P, Hantson P, Werion A . Regional citrate anticoagulation and influence of recirculation on ionized calcium levels in the circuit. J Artif Organs. 2019; 22(4):341-344. DOI: 10.1007/s10047-019-01125-3. View