» Articles » PMID: 34801090

"PPI? That Sounds Like Payment Protection Insurance": Reflections and Learning from a Substance Use and Homelessness Study Experts by Experience Group

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Nov 21
PMID 34801090
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patient and Public Involvement in research is important for citizenship, accountability and transparency, and has the practical benefit of helping to ensure its quality and applicability. Involving members of the public in research is becoming increasingly commonplace, in the UK and internationally. It is essential that public involvement is inclusive of individuals and their diverse life experiences, including challenging experiences that may be associated with stigma and social exclusion. The involvement of people with lived/living experience of substance use and homelessness in research is increasing in response to increased recognition of the importance of inclusion and the benefits conferred to research.

Main Body: In this commentary, we share our own experiences of being part of a Patient and Public Involvement group that was convened during a feasibility study of a peer-delivered harm reduction intervention. We are a diverse group but share experience of the field of substance use/homelessness, as people with lived/living experience, and as researchers and practitioners. We share our reflections and learning, as well as offer recommendations for researchers working in our field. Our group worked together to make a positive and deliberate contribution to the study. This did not happen by chance but required the development of mutual trust and respect, with each member having a commitment to support the group for its two-year duration.

Short Conclusion: It is important for researchers to appreciate that meaningful Patient and Public Involvement is very valuable but requires a commitment from all involved. Regarding our field of substance use and homelessness specifically, it is essential that people with these experiences have opportunities to contribute to research and can do so in a meaningful way. People with lived/living experience are able to bring to life the rich tapestry of others' experiences. However, the involvement must be neither tokenistic nor indifferent to the wider challenges common to these experiences.

Citing Articles

Applying Normalisation Process Theory to a peer-delivered complex health intervention for people experiencing homelessness and problem substance use.

Foster R, Carver H, Matheson C, Pauly B, Wallace J, MacLennan G Commun Med (Lond). 2025; 5(1):13.

PMID: 39794533 PMC: 11724100. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00721-6.


Patient and Public Involvement in Research Evaluating Integrated Care for People Experiencing Homelessness: Findings From the PHOENIx Community Pharmacy Pilot Randomised-Controlled Trial.

McPherson A, Paudyal V, Lowrie R, Heath H, Moir J, Allen N Health Expect. 2024; 27(5):e70070.

PMID: 39425447 PMC: 11489131. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70070.


Interrogating the effectiveness of service engagement for underserved populations in complex health and social care systems: towards an equitable engagement strategy.

Carroll B, Walsh K Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):197.

PMID: 39363179 PMC: 11451094. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02272-7.


Commissioning and co-production in health and care services in the United Kingdom and Ireland: An exploratory literature review.

Scott R, Mathie E, Newman H, Almack K, Brady L Health Expect. 2024; 27(3):e14053.

PMID: 38698629 PMC: 11066417. DOI: 10.1111/hex.14053.


Doing community-based research during dual public health emergencies (COVID and overdose).

McGreevy P, Wood S, Thomson E, Burmeister C, Spence H, Pelletier J Harm Reduct J. 2023; 20(1):135.

PMID: 37715202 PMC: 10504762. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00852-4.


References
1.
Broyles L, Binswanger I, Jenkins J, Finnell D, Faseru B, Cavaiola A . Confronting inadvertent stigma and pejorative language in addiction scholarship: a recognition and response. Subst Abus. 2014; 35(3):217-21. PMC: 6042508. DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2014.930372. View

2.
Richards D, Birnie K, Eubanks K, Lane T, Linkiewich D, Singer L . Guidance on authorship with and acknowledgement of patient partners in patient-oriented research. Res Involv Engagem. 2020; 6:38. PMC: 7331134. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-020-00213-6. View

3.
Boylan A, Locock L, Thomson R, Staniszewska S . "About sixty per cent I want to do it": Health researchers' attitudes to, and experiences of, patient and public involvement (PPI)-A qualitative interview study. Health Expect. 2019; 22(4):721-730. PMC: 6737750. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12883. View

4.
Dudley L, Gamble C, Allam A, Bell P, Buck D, Goodare H . A little more conversation please? Qualitative study of researchers' and patients' interview accounts of training for patient and public involvement in clinical trials. Trials. 2015; 16:190. PMC: 4410574. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0667-4. View

5.
Ocloo J, Matthews R . From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016; 25(8):626-32. PMC: 4975844. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839. View