» Articles » PMID: 30927334

"About Sixty Per Cent I Want to Do It": Health Researchers' Attitudes To, and Experiences Of, Patient and Public Involvement (PPI)-A Qualitative Interview Study

Overview
Journal Health Expect
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Mar 31
PMID 30927334
Citations 72
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Funders, policy-makers and research organizations increasingly expect health researchers in the UK to involve patients and members of the public in research. It has been stated that it makes research "more effective, more credible and often more cost efficient." However, the evidence base for this assertion is evolving and can be limited. There has been little research into how health researchers feel about involving people, how they go about it, how they manage formal policy rhetoric, and what happens in practice.

Objective: To explore researchers' experiences and perceptions of patient and public involvement (PPI).

Methods: Semi-structured interview study of 36 health researchers (both clinical and non-clinical), with data collection and thematic analysis informed by the theoretical domains framework.

Results: In the course of our analysis, we developed four themes that encapsulate the participants' experiences and perceptions of PPI. Participants expressed ambivalence, cynicism and enthusiasm about PPI, an activity that creates emotional labour, which is both rewarding and burdensome and requires practical and social support. It is operationalized in an academic context influenced by power and incentives.

Discussion And Conclusions: Researchers' experiences and attitudes towards patient and public involvement are a key factor in the successful embedding of involvement within the wider research culture. We call for a culture change that supports the development of effective organizational approach to support involvement.

Citing Articles

Lessons learnt from developing an ethnically diverse patient and public involvement group for breast cancer research.

Gathani T, Dhaliwal B, Lwiindi J, Dawson S BMJ Open. 2025; 15(3):e091888.

PMID: 40032390 PMC: 11877151. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091888.


Bridging the Gap: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Impact of the Involvement of Researchers With Lived Experience on a Multisite Randomised Control Trial in the National Probation Service in England and Wales.

Simes E, Butler S, Allison E, Barrett B, Bateman A, Cameron A Health Expect. 2025; 28(1):e70162.

PMID: 39902497 PMC: 11791406. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70162.


Establishing patient partners' roles on research teams: a scoping review.

Tobiano G, Gillespie B, Carlini J, Muir R, Rasiah J, Wan C Res Involv Engagem. 2024; 10(1):129.

PMID: 39696699 PMC: 11653694. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00664-1.


Involving stakeholders with lived and professional experience in a realist review of community mental health crisis services: a commentary.

Ashman M, Clibbens N, Thompson J, Gilburt H, Thompson E, Khalid Y Res Involv Engagem. 2024; 10(1):130.

PMID: 39696560 PMC: 11653646. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00662-3.


Involving Knowledge Users in Health Services Research: Collective Reflections and Learning From a National Evaluation of Recurrent Miscarriage Services.

Hennessy M, Dennehy R, OLeary H, ODonoghue K Health Expect. 2024; 27(6):e70125.

PMID: 39682042 PMC: 11649583. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70125.


References
1.
Locock L, Kirkpatrick S, Brading L, Sturmey G, Cornwell J, Churchill N . Involving service users in the qualitative analysis of patient narratives to support healthcare quality improvement. Res Involv Engagem. 2019; 5:1. PMC: 6318884. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-018-0133-z. View

2.
Domecq J, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N . Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:89. PMC: 3938901. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89. View

3.
Evans B, Porter A, Snooks H, Burholt V . A co-produced method to involve service users in research: the SUCCESS model. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19(1):34. PMC: 6377726. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0671-6. View

4.
Staley K, Abbey-Vital I, Nolan C . The impact of involvement on researchers: a learning experience. Res Involv Engagem. 2017; 3:20. PMC: 5611580. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-017-0071-1. View

5.
Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S . GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017; 358:j3453. PMC: 5539518. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j3453. View