» Articles » PMID: 34796670

Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Staging May Influence Management in Users: A Survey Study

Overview
Journal Cancer Med
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Nov 19
PMID 34796670
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to determine whether there is consensus regarding staging and management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) across the various specialties that manage this disease.

Materials And Methods: A survey regarding CSCC high-risk features, staging, and management was created and emailed to cutaneous oncology experts including dermatology, head and neck surgery/surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and medical oncology.

Results: One hundred fifty-six (46%) of 357 invited physicians completed the survey. Depth of invasion (92%), perineural invasion (99%), histologic differentiation (85%), and patient immunosuppression (90%) achieved consensus (>80%) as high-risk features of CSCC. Dermatologists were more likely to also choose clinical tumor diameter (79% vs. 54%) and histology (99% vs. 66%) as a high-risk feature. Dermatologists were also more likely to utilize the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) staging system alone or in conjunction with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) (71%), whereas other cancer specialists (OCS) tend to use only AJCC (71%). Respondents considered AJCC T3 and higher (90%) and BWH T2b and higher (100%) to be high risk and when they consider radiologic imaging, sentinel lymph node biopsy, post-operative radiation therapy, and increased follow-up. Notably, a large number of respondents do not use staging systems or tumor stage to determine treatment options beyond surgery in high-risk CSCC.

Conclusion: This survey study highlights areas of consensus and differences regarding the definition of high-risk features of CSCC, staging approaches, and management patterns between dermatologists and OCS. High-risk CSCC is defined as, but not limited to, BWH T2b and higher and AJCC T3 and higher, and these thresholds can be used to identify cases for which treatment beyond surgery may be considered. Dermatologists are more likely to utilize BWH staging, likely because BWH validation studies showing advantages over AJCC were published in dermatology journals and discussed at dermatology meetings. Additional data are necessary to develop a comprehensive risk-based management approach for CSCC.

Citing Articles

Distinguishing Keratoacanthoma from Well-Differentiated Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Single-Cell Spatial Pathology.

Veenstra J, Ozog D, Loveless I, Adrianto I, Dimitrion P, Subedi K J Invest Dermatol. 2023; 143(12):2397-2407.e8.

PMID: 37419445 PMC: 10840781. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2023.06.192.


Current Methods and Caveats to Risk Factor Assessment in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC): A Narrative Review.

Farberg A, Fitzgerald A, Ibrahim S, Tolkachjov S, Soleymani T, Douglas L Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022; 12(2):267-284.

PMID: 34994967 PMC: 8850485. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-021-00673-y.


Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma staging may influence management in users: A survey study.

Patel V, McCullum C, Sparks A, Schmults C, Arron S, Jambusaria-Pahlajani A Cancer Med. 2021; 11(1):94-103.

PMID: 34796670 PMC: 8704160. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4426.

References
1.
Czarnecki D, Staples M, Mar A, Giles G, Meehan C . Metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the skin in southern Australia. Dermatology. 1994; 189(1):52-4. DOI: 10.1159/000246783. View

2.
Lanz J, Bouwes Bavinck J, Westhuis M, Quint K, Harwood C, Nasir S . Aggressive Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Organ Transplant Recipients. JAMA Dermatol. 2018; 155(1):66-71. PMC: 6439577. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4406. View

3.
Patel V, McCullum C, Sparks A, Schmults C, Arron S, Jambusaria-Pahlajani A . Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma staging may influence management in users: A survey study. Cancer Med. 2021; 11(1):94-103. PMC: 8704160. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4426. View

4.
Conde-Ferreiros A, Corchete L, Puebla-Tornero L, Corchado-Cobos R, Garcia-Sancha N, Roman-Curto C . Definition of prognostic subgroups in the T3 stage of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Tentative T3 stage subclassification. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020; 85(5):1168-1177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.088. View

5.
Tschetter A, Campoli M, Zitelli J, Brodland D . Long-term clinical outcomes of patients with invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery: A 5-year, multicenter, prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019; 82(1):139-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.1303. View