» Articles » PMID: 34782024

Robotic-based ACTive SomatoSENSory (Act.Sens) Retraining on Upper Limb Functions with Chronic Stroke Survivors: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Nov 16
PMID 34782024
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Prior studies have established that senses of the limb position in space (proprioception and kinaesthesia) are important for motor control and learning. Although nearly one-half of stroke patients have impairment in the ability to sense their movements, somatosensory retraining focusing on proprioception and kinaesthesia is often overlooked. Interventions that simultaneously target motor and somatosensory components are thought to be useful for relearning somatosensory functions while increasing mobility of the affected limb. For over a decade, robotic technology has been incorporated in stroke rehabilitation for more controlled therapy intensity, duration, and frequency. This pilot randomised controlled trial introduces a compact robotic-based upper-limb reaching task that retrains proprioception and kinaesthesia concurrently.

Methods: Thirty first-ever chronic stroke survivors (> 6-month post-stroke) will be randomly assigned to either a treatment or a control group. Over a 5-week period, the treatment group will receive 15 training sessions for about an hour per session. Robot-generated haptic guidance will be provided along the movement path as somatosensory cues while moving. Audio-visual feedback will appear following every successful movement as a reward. For the same duration, the control group will complete similar robotic training but without the vision occluded and robot-generated cues. Baseline, post-day 1, and post-day 30 assessments will be performed, where the last two sessions will be conducted after the last training session. Robotic-based performance indices and clinical assessments of upper limb functions after stroke will be used to acquire primary and secondary outcome measures respectively. This work will provide insights into the feasibility of such robot-assisted training clinically.

Discussion: The current work presents a study protocol to retrain upper-limb somatosensory and motor functions using robot-based rehabilitation for community-dwelling stroke survivors. The training promotes active use of the affected arm while at the same time enhances somatosensory input through augmented feedback. The outcomes of this study will provide preliminary data and help inform the clinicians on the feasibility and practicality of the proposed exercise.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04490655 . Registered 29 July 2020.

Citing Articles

Current clinical practice in managing somatosensory impairments and the use of technology in stroke rehabilitation.

Sidarta A, Lim Y, Wong R, Tan I, Kuah C, Ang W PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0270693.

PMID: 35951544 PMC: 9371309. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270693.

References
1.
Hogan N, Krebs H . Physically interactive robotic technology for neuromotor rehabilitation. Prog Brain Res. 2011; 192:59-68. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53355-5.00004-X. View

2.
Campolo D, Tommasino P, Gamage K, Klein J, Hughes C, Masia L . H-Man: a planar, H-shape cabled differential robotic manipulandum for experiments on human motor control. J Neurosci Methods. 2014; 235:285-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.07.003. View

3.
Dukelow S, Herter T, Moore K, Demers M, Glasgow J, Bagg S . Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 24(2):178-87. DOI: 10.1177/1545968309345267. View

4.
Bhaskar S, Stanwell P, Bivard A, Spratt N, Walker R, Kitsos G . The influence of initial stroke severity on mortality, overall functional outcome and in-hospital placement at 90 days following acute ischemic stroke: A tertiary hospital stroke register study. Neurol India. 2017; 65(6):1252-1259. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.217947. View

5.
Bohannon R, Smith M . Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987; 67(2):206-7. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206. View