» Articles » PMID: 34771606

B3 Lesions at Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy Under Ultrasound or Mammography Guidance: A Single-Center Experience on 3634 Consecutive Biopsies

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Nov 13
PMID 34771606
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The rate of upgrade to cancer for breast lesions with uncertain malignant potential (B3 lesions) diagnosed at needle biopsy is highly influenced by several factors, but large series are seldom available. We retrospectively assessed the upgrade rates of a consecutive series of B3 lesions diagnosed at ultrasound- or mammography-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) at an EUSOMA-certified Breast Unit over a 7-year timeframe. The upgrade rate was defined as the number of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer at pathology after excision or during follow-up divided by the total number of B3 lesions. All lesions were reviewed by one of four pathologists with a second opinion for discordant assessments of borderline cases. Excision or surveillance were defined by the multidisciplinary tumor board, with 6- and 12-month follow-up. Out of 3634 VABs (63% ultrasound-guided), 604 (17%) yielded a B3 lesion. After excision, 17/604 B3 lesions were finally upgraded to malignancy (2.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-4.5%), 10/17 (59%) being upgraded to DCIS and 7/17 (41%) to invasive carcinoma. No cases were upgraded during follow-up. B3a lesions showed a significantly lower upgrade rate (0.4%, 95% CI 0.1-2.1%) than B3b lesions (4.7%, 95% CI 2.9-7.5%, = 0.001), that had a 22.0 adjusted odds ratio for upgrade (95% CI 2.1-232.3). No significant difference was found in upgrade rates according to imaging guidance or needle caliper. Surveillance-oriented management can be considered for B3a lesions, while surgical excision should be pursued for B3b lesions.

Citing Articles

Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Lobular In Situ Neoplasm: High-Risk Lesions Challenging Breast Cancer Prevention.

Nicosia L, Mariano L, Pellegrino G, Ferrari F, Pesapane F, Bozzini A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(4).

PMID: 38398228 PMC: 10886664. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040837.


Breast Lesions of Uncertain Malignant Potential (B3) and the Risk of Breast Cancer Development: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

Bellini C, Nori Cucchiari J, di Naro F, de Benedetto D, Bicchierai G, Franconeri A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(13).

PMID: 37444630 PMC: 10340484. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133521.


Third International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions).

Elfgen C, Leo C, Kubik-Huch R, Muenst S, Schmidt N, Quinn C Virchows Arch. 2023; 483(1):5-20.

PMID: 37330436 PMC: 10326140. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03566-x.


[B3 lesions of the breast: histological, clinical, and epidemiological aspects : Update].

Varga Z, Sinn P, Lebeau A Pathologie (Heidelb). 2023; 44(1):5-16.

PMID: 36635403 PMC: 9877091. DOI: 10.1007/s00292-022-01180-3.


Overview of incidental breast lesions.

Guirguis M, Yang W Br J Radiol. 2022; 96(1142):20211326.

PMID: 35451861 PMC: 9975524. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20211326.

References
1.
Rakha E, Ellis I . An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol. 2007; 60(12):1300-6. PMC: 2095575. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2006.045377. View

2.
Park H, Kim L . The current role of vacuum assisted breast biopsy system in breast disease. J Breast Cancer. 2011; 14(1):1-7. PMC: 3148506. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2011.14.1.1. View

3.
Cozzi A, Schiaffino S, Sardanelli F . The emerging role of contrast-enhanced mammography. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020; 9(12):2012-2018. PMC: 6942965. DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.11.09. View

4.
Calhoun B . Core Needle Biopsy of the Breast: An Evaluation of Contemporary Data. Surg Pathol Clin. 2018; 11(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2017.09.001. View

5.
Rudin A, Hoskin T, Fahy A, Farrell A, Nassar A, Ghosh K . Flat Epithelial Atypia on Core Biopsy and Upgrade to Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017; 24(12):3549-3558. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6059-0. View