Surgical Excision for B3 Breast Lesions Diagnosed by Vacuum-assisted Core Biopsy
Overview
Affiliations
Unlabelled: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess whether open surgical excision is required following a B3 diagnosis on 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsy (VACB) of radiologically indeterminate breast lesions.
Patients And Methods: Twenty-four women with a histological diagnosis of the B3 category on VACB of radiologically indeterminate breast lesions were identified over a 3-year period. The VACB procedure was performed under stereotactic (n=21), ultrasound (n=2) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n=1) guidance using the Suros system. Nineteen patients underwent open surgical excision. The remaining 5 patients who had 'complete' removal of the radiological abnormality using VACB under ultrasound (n=2, papilloma) or stereotactic (n=4, atypical ductal hyperplasia) guidance were followed up clinically and radiologically.
Results: The median patient age was 49 years. The disease status in three patients was upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ at open surgical excision. The VACB showed atypical lobular hyperplasia in these 3 patients, associated with microcalcification (n=2) or mass lesion (n=1). No single case of upgrading to invasive breast cancer was identified in our series. The remaining patients (16 out of 19) had a benign biopsy. The upgrade to malignancy was significantly associated with the presence of atypical lobular hyperplasia, a BI-RADS category of 4 and incomplete removal of the radiological abnormality by VACB. After a mean follow-up of 18 months, no malignancy was detected in the 5 patients who did not undergo open surgical biopsy.
Conclusion: Open surgical excision is strongly recommended for atypical lobular hyperplasia identified in VACB specimens. VACB can be a safe alternative to surgery in the treatment of B3 lesions in selected cases, providing thorough multidisciplinary discussion has taken place.
Encapsulated papillary carcinoma of the breast: An institutional case series and literature review.
Tan H, Tan P, Leong L, Tan V, Tan B, Lim S Cancer Med. 2023; 12(10):11408-11416.
PMID: 36999966 PMC: 10242344. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5855.
Girardi V, Guaragni M, Ruzzenenti N, Palmieri F, Fogazzi G, Cozzi A Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(21).
PMID: 34771606 PMC: 8582448. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215443.
Steponaviciene L, Gudaviciene D, Briediene R, Petroska D, Garnelyte A Acta Med Litu. 2018; 25(2):66-75.
PMID: 30210240 PMC: 6130924. DOI: 10.6001/actamedica.v25i2.3759.
Differentiating vacuum-assisted breast biopsy from core needle biopsy: Is it necessary?.
Nakano S, Imawari Y, Mibu A, Otsuka M, Oinuma T Br J Radiol. 2018; 91(1092):20180250.
PMID: 29975150 PMC: 6319844. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180250.
The B3 conundrum-the radiologists' perspective.
Sharma N, Wilkinson L, Pinder S Br J Radiol. 2016; 90(1071):20160595.
PMID: 27936888 PMC: 5601507. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160595.