» Articles » PMID: 34762589

Low-Frequency Entrainment to Visual Motion Underlies Sign Language Comprehension

Overview
Publisher IEEE
Date 2021 Nov 11
PMID 34762589
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When people listen to speech, neural activity tracks the entropy fluctuation in the acoustic envelope of the signal. This signal-based entrainment has been shown to be the basis of speech parsing and comprehension. In this electroencephalography (EEG) study, we compute sign language users' cortical tracking of changes in visual dynamics of the communicative signal in the time-direct videos of sign language, and their time-reversed counterparts, and assess the relative contribution of response frequencies between.2 and 12.4 Hz to comprehension using a machine learning approach to brain state classification. Lower frequencies of EEG response (.2-4 Hz) yield 100% classification accuracy, while information about cortical tracking of the visual envelope in higher frequencies is less informative. This suggests that signers rely on lower visual frequency data, such as envelope of visual signal, for sign language comprehension. In the context of real-time language processing, given the speed of comprehension responses, this suggests that fluent signers employ a predictive processing heuristic based on sign language knowledge.

Citing Articles

Effect of sign language learning on temporal resolution of visual attention.

Karabuklu S, Wood S, Bradley C, Wilbur R, Malaia E J Vis. 2025; 25(1):3.

PMID: 39752178 PMC: 11706239. DOI: 10.1167/jov.25.1.3.


Afferents to Action: Cortical Proprioceptive Processing Assessed with Corticokinematic Coherence Specifically Relates to Gross Motor Skills.

Mongold S, Georgiev C, Legrand T, Bourguignon M eNeuro. 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 38164580 PMC: 10849019. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0384-23.2023.


Prediction underlying comprehension of human motion: an analysis of Deaf signer and non-signer EEG in response to visual stimuli.

Malaia E, Borneman S, Borneman J, Krebs J, Wilbur R Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1218510.

PMID: 37901437 PMC: 10602904. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1218510.


Predictive Processing in Sign Languages: A Systematic Review.

Radosevic T, Malaia E, Milkovic M Front Psychol. 2022; 13:805792.

PMID: 35496220 PMC: 9047358. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805792.

References
1.
Mathewson K, Prudhomme C, Fabiani M, Beck D, Lleras A, Gratton G . Making waves in the stream of consciousness: entraining oscillations in EEG alpha and fluctuations in visual awareness with rhythmic visual stimulation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012; 24(12):2321-33. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00288. View

2.
Stone A, Petitto L, Bosworth R . Visual Sonority Modulates Infants' Attraction to Sign Language. Lang Learn Dev. 2020; 14(2):130-148. PMC: 7500480. DOI: 10.1080/15475441.2017.1404468. View

3.
Byers-Heinlein K, Fennell C . Perceptual narrowing in the context of increased variation: Insights from bilingual infants. Dev Psychobiol. 2013; 56(2):274-91. DOI: 10.1002/dev.21167. View

4.
Ding N, Melloni L, Zhang H, Tian X, Poeppel D . Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 19(1):158-64. PMC: 4809195. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4186. View

5.
Greene M, Hansen B . Disentangling the Independent Contributions of Visual and Conceptual Features to the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Scene Categorization. J Neurosci. 2020; 40(27):5283-5299. PMC: 7329300. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2088-19.2020. View