» Articles » PMID: 34744906

Test-Retest Reliability and Reliable Change Estimates for Four Mobile Cognitive Tests Administered Virtually in Community-Dwelling Adults

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2021 Nov 8
PMID 34744906
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Remote mobile cognitive testing (MCT) is an expanding area of research, but psychometric data supporting these measures are limited. We provide preliminary data on test-retest reliability and reliable change estimates in four MCTs from SWAY Medical, Inc. Fifty-five adults from the U.S. Midwest completed the MCTs remotely on their personal mobile devices once per week for 3 consecutive weeks, while being supervised with a video-based virtual connection. The cognitive assessment measured simple reaction time ("Reaction Time"), go/no-go response inhibition ("Impulse Control"), timed visual processing ("Inspection Time"), and working memory ("Working Memory"). For each cognitive test except Working Memory, we analyzed both millisecond (ms) responses and an overall SWAY composite score. The mean age of the sample was 26.69years (SD=9.89; range=18-58). Of the 55 adults, 38 (69.1%) were women and 49 (89.1%) used an iPhone. Friedman's ANOVAs examining differences across testing sessions were nonsignificant (s>0.31). Intraclass correlations for Weeks 1-3 were: Reaction Time (ms): 0.83, Reaction Time (SWAY): 0.83, Impulse Control (ms): 0.68, Impulse Control (SWAY): 0.80, Inspection Time (ms): 0.75, Inspection Time (SWAY): 0.75, and Working Memory (SWAY): 0.88. Intraclass correlations for Weeks 1-2 were: Reaction Time (ms): 0.75, Reaction Time (SWAY): 0.74, Impulse Control (ms): 0.60, Impulse Control (SWAY): 0.76, Inspection Time (ms): 0.79, Inspection Time (SWAY): 0.79, and Working Memory (SWAY): 0.83. Natural distributions of difference scores were calculated and reliable change estimates are presented for 70, 80, and 90% CIs. : Test-retest reliability was adequate or better for the MCTs in this virtual remote testing study. Reliable change estimates allow for the determination of whether a particular level of improvement or decline in performance is within the range of probable measurement error. Additional reliability and validity data are needed in other age groups.

Citing Articles

Pupillometry as a new window to player fatigue? A glimpse inside the eyes of a Euro Cup Women's Basketball team.

Huyghe T, Calleja-Gonzalez J, Bird S, Alcaraz P Biol Sport. 2024; 41(1):3-15.

PMID: 38188113 PMC: 10765450. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.125590.


Test-Retest reliability and preliminary reliable change estimates for Sway Balance tests administered remotely in community-dwelling adults.

Caccese J, Teel E, Van Patten R, Muzeau M, Iverson G, VanRavenhorst-Bell H Front Digit Health. 2022; 4:999250.

PMID: 36405418 PMC: 9667020. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.999250.


The ambulatory battery of creativity: Additional evidence for reliability and validity.

Rominger C, Fink A, Benedek M, Weber B, Perchtold-Stefan C, Schwerdtfeger A Front Psychol. 2022; 13:964206.

PMID: 36186395 PMC: 9524250. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964206.

References
1.
Jacobson N, Truax P . Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991; 59(1):12-9. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.1.12. View

2.
Koo B, Vizer L . Mobile Technology for Cognitive Assessment of Older Adults: A Scoping Review. Innov Aging. 2019; 3(1):igy038. PMC: 6312550. DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igy038. View

3.
Brouillette R, Foil H, Fontenot S, Correro A, Allen R, Martin C . Feasibility, reliability, and validity of a smartphone based application for the assessment of cognitive function in the elderly. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e65925. PMC: 3679011. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065925. View

4.
Weizenbaum E, Torous J, Fulford D . Cognition in Context: Understanding the Everyday Predictors of Cognitive Performance in a New Era of Measurement. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(7):e14328. PMC: 7413292. DOI: 10.2196/14328. View

5.
Burghart M, Craig J, Radel J, Huisinga J . Reliability and validity of a motion-based reaction time assessment using a mobile device. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2018; 26(6):558-563. PMC: 7309344. DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2018.1469491. View