» Articles » PMID: 34739524

Impact of the Sinus Node Recovery Time After Termination of Atrial Fibrillation During Catheter Ablation on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Nov 5
PMID 34739524
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although long sinus arrest is occasionally observed during atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation when the fibrillation was terminated, its meaning and prognosis have not yet been clearly elucidated. We hypothesized that sinus node recovery time (SNRT) after termination of AF (time from termination of AF to the earliest sinus node activation) could reflect the extent of atrial remodeling, influencing the formation of non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) triggers and post-ablation outcomes.

Method: The participants were 157 consecutive patients with persistent AF (male: 77.1%, age: 63.3±11.2 years) who underwent catheter ablation. We recorded SNRT after terminating AF by radiofrequency delivery or electrical cardioversion during the first ablation and evaluated the relationships between SNRT and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and between SNRT and non-PV triggers after repeat ablation.

Results: Forty-five patients (28.7%) experienced recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Patients with recurrence had longer SNRTs (1738 ms vs. 1394 ms, p = 0.012). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only SNRT ≥2128ms was a significant independent predictor of clinical AF recurrence (hazard ratio 7.48; 95% confidence interval 2.94-19.00; P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimator showed that the recurrence-free rate was significantly lower if ≥ 2128ms (log-rank, p<0.001). Thirty-five patients (77.8%) underwent a second ablation. Although there was no difference in the rate of pulmonary vein reconnections (78.6% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.712), non-PV triggers were observed more frequently in the longer SNRT group (57.1% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.012).

Conclusions: Patients with a prolonged SNRT had a higher prevalence of AF recurrence after the first ablation and higher inducibility of non-PV triggers. Measuring SNRT might be used for the stratification of patients with persistent AF.

Citing Articles

Long-term outcome after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with postprocedurally unmasked sinus node disease.

Kantenwein V, Martini E, Haller B, Telishevska M, Bourier F, Reents T J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39903343 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-025-01998-w.


Neonatal Scn1b-null mice have sinoatrial node dysfunction, altered atrial structure, and atrial fibrillation.

Ramos-Mondragon R, Edokobi N, Hodges S, Wang S, Bouza A, Canugovi C JCI Insight. 2022; 7(10).

PMID: 35603785 PMC: 9220823. DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.152050.

References
1.
Tse H, Lau C . Prevalence and clinical implications of atrial fibrillation episodes detected by pacemaker in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Heart. 2005; 91(3):362-4. PMC: 1768760. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2003.027219. View

2.
Kato N, Nitta J, Sato A, Inamura Y, Takamiya T, Inaba O . Characteristics of the nonpulmonary vein foci induced after second-generation cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019; 31(1):174-184. DOI: 10.1111/jce.14314. View

3.
Hayashi K, Fukunaga M, Yamaji K, An Y, Nagashima M, Hiroshima K . Impact of Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Sick Sinus Syndrome - Important Role of Non-Pulmonary Vein Foci. Circ J. 2016; 80(4):887-94. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1384. View

4.
Inamura Y, Nitta J, Inaba O, Sato A, Takamiya T, Murata K . Presence of non-pulmonary vein foci in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing standard ablation of pulmonary vein isolation: Clinical characteristics and long-term ablation outcome. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021; 32:100717. PMC: 7822950. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100717. View

5.
Akoum N, McGann C, Vergara G, Badger T, Ranjan R, Mahnkopf C . Atrial fibrosis quantified using late gadolinium enhancement MRI is associated with sinus node dysfunction requiring pacemaker implant. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011; 23(1):44-50. PMC: 4465539. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02140.x. View