» Articles » PMID: 34735439

Kdr Genotyping (V1016I, F1534C) of the Nav Channel of Aedes Aegypti (L.) Mosquito Populations in Harris County (Houston), Texas, USA, After Permanone 31-66 Field Tests and Its Influence on Probability of Survival

Overview
Date 2021 Nov 4
PMID 34735439
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aedes aegypti (L.) is an important mosquito vector of emerging arboviruses such as Zika, dengue, yellow fever, and chikungunya. To quell potential disease outbreaks, its populations are controlled by applying pyrethroid insecticides, which selection pressure may lead to the development of insecticide resistance. Target site insensitivity to pyrethroids caused by non-synonymous knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in the voltage-gated sodium (NaV) channel is a predominant mechanism of resistance in mosquitoes. To evaluate the potential impact of pyrethroid resistance on vector control, Ae. aegypti eggs were collected from eight mosquito control operational areas in Harris County, Texas, and emerged females were treated in field tests at four different distances from the pyrethroid Permanone 31-66 source. The females were genotyped by melting curve analyses to detect two kdr mutations (V1016I and F1534C) in the NaV channel. Harris County females had higher survivorship rates at each distance than the pyrethroid-susceptible Orlando strain females. Survivorship increased with distance from the pyrethroid source, with 39% of field-collected mosquitoes surviving at 7.62 m and 82.3% at 22.86 m from the treatment source. Both the V1016I and F1534C pyrethroid resistant genotypes were widely distributed and at high frequency, with 77% of the females being double homozygous resistant (II/CC), this being the first report of kdr mutations in Ae. aegypti in Harris County. Analysis of the probability of survival for each mutation site independently indicated that the CC genotype had similar probability of survival as the FC heterozygous, while the II genotype had higher survival than both the VI and VV, that did not differ. The double homozygous resistant genotype (II/CC) had the highest probability of survival. A linear model estimated probability of survival for areas and genotypes. The high frequency and widespread distribution of double-homozygote pyrethroid-resistant Ae. aegypti may jeopardize disease vector control efforts in Harris County.

Citing Articles

Detection of the 1016Gly and 989Pro Knockdown Resistance Mutations in Florida, USA .

Estep A, Sanscrainte N, Lamberg F, McStoots D, Gosselin S Insects. 2024; 15(11).

PMID: 39590462 PMC: 11594491. DOI: 10.3390/insects15110863.


Monitoring of pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti: first report of double and triple kdr mutations in Buenos Aires Province.

Barrera-Illanes A, Ledesma L, Alvarez-Costa A, Balsalobre A, Toloza C, Hernandez-Maiztegui A Parasit Vectors. 2024; 17(1):458.

PMID: 39522041 PMC: 11549831. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06547-4.


Insecticide Resistance in Mosquitoes: Possible Detection of F1534C, S989P, and V1016G Triple Mutation in Benin, West Africa.

Tokponnon T, Osse R, Zoulkifilou S, Amos G, Festus H, Idayath G Insects. 2024; 15(4).

PMID: 38667425 PMC: 11049891. DOI: 10.3390/insects15040295.


Kdr genotyping and the first report of V410L and V1016I kdr mutations in voltage-gated sodium channel gene in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Iran.

Enayati A, Valadan R, Bagherzadeh M, Cheraghpour M, Nikookar S, Fazeli-Dinan M Parasit Vectors. 2024; 17(1):34.

PMID: 38273349 PMC: 10811842. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06123-w.


Automated analysis of feeding behaviors of females of the mosquito Aedes aegypti using a modified flyPAD system.

Henriques-Santos B, Xiong C, Pietrantonio P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20188.

PMID: 37980438 PMC: 10657447. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47277-4.


References
1.
Chen M, Du Y, Nomura Y, Zhorov B, Dong K . Chronology of sodium channel mutations associated with pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2020; 104(2):e21686. PMC: 8060125. DOI: 10.1002/arch.21686. View

2.
Cornel A, Holeman J, Nieman C, Lee Y, Smith C, Amorino M . Surveillance, insecticide resistance and control of an invasive Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) population in California. F1000Res. 2016; 5:194. PMC: 4857756. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.8107.3. View

3.
Calisher C, Gutierrez E, Maness K, Lord R . Isolation of Mayaro virus from a migrating bird captured in Louisiana in 1967. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1974; 8(3):243-8. View

4.
Smith L, Sears C, Sun H, Mertz R, Kasai S, Scott J . CYP-mediated resistance and cross-resistance to pyrethroids and organophosphates in Aedes aegypti in the presence and absence of kdr. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2019; 160:119-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.07.011. View

5.
Ryan S, Mundis S, Aguirre A, Lippi C, Beltran E, Heras F . Seasonal and geographic variation in insecticide resistance in Aedes aegypti in southern Ecuador. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019; 13(6):e0007448. PMC: 6586360. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007448. View