» Articles » PMID: 34714468

Automated High Throughput PK and Distribution Coefficient Measurements of Pharmaceutical Compounds for the SAMPL8 Blind Prediction Challenge

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2021 Oct 29
PMID 34714468
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The goal of the Statistical Assessment of the Modeling of Proteins and Ligands (SAMPL) challenge is to improve the accuracy of current computational models to estimate free energy of binding, deprotonation, distribution and other associated physical properties that are useful for the design of new pharmaceutical products. New experimental datasets of physicochemical properties provide opportunities for prospective evaluation of computational prediction methods. Here, aqueous pK and a range of bi-phasic logD values for a variety of pharmaceutical compounds were determined through a streamlined automated process to be utilized in the SAMPL8 physical property challenge. The goal of this paper is to provide an in-depth review of the experimental methods utilized to create a comprehensive data set for the blind prediction challenge. The significance of this work involves the use of high throughput experimentation equipment and instrumentation to produce acid dissociation constants for twenty-three drug molecules, as well as distribution coefficients for eleven of those molecules.

Citing Articles

Interpretable Deep-Learning p Prediction for Small Molecule Drugs via Atomic Sensitivity Analysis.

DeCorte J, Brown B, Jeffrey R, Meiler J J Chem Inf Model. 2025; 65(1):101-113.

PMID: 39801290 PMC: 11733947. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01472.


COSMO-RS blind prediction of distribution coefficients and aqueous pKa values from the SAMPL8 challenge.

Diedenhofen M, Eckert F, Terzi S J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2023; 37(8):395-405.

PMID: 37365370 DOI: 10.1007/s10822-023-00514-4.


Automated high throughput pK and distribution coefficient measurements of pharmaceutical compounds for the SAMPL8 blind prediction challenge.

Bahr M, Nandkeolyar A, Kenna J, Nevins N, Da Via L, Isik M J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2021; 35(11):1141-1155.

PMID: 34714468 PMC: 9313606. DOI: 10.1007/s10822-021-00427-0.

References
1.
Alsenz J, Kansy M . High throughput solubility measurement in drug discovery and development. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007; 59(7):546-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.05.007. View

2.
Geballe M, Guthrie J . The SAMPL3 blind prediction challenge: transfer energy overview. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012; 26(5):489-96. DOI: 10.1007/s10822-012-9568-8. View

3.
Nicholls A, Mobley D, Guthrie J, Chodera J, Bayly C, Cooper M . Predicting small-molecule solvation free energies: an informal blind test for computational chemistry. J Med Chem. 2008; 51(4):769-79. DOI: 10.1021/jm070549+. View

4.
Utsey K, Gastonguay M, Russell S, Freling R, Riggs M, Elmokadem A . Quantification of the Impact of Partition Coefficient Prediction Methods on Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model Output Using a Standardized Tissue Composition. Drug Metab Dispos. 2020; 48(10):903-916. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.120.090498. View

5.
Fridgeirsdottir G, Harris R, Fischer P, Roberts C . Support Tools in Formulation Development for Poorly Soluble Drugs. J Pharm Sci. 2016; 105(8):2260-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.05.024. View