» Articles » PMID: 34697239

Estimating Sexual Size Dimorphism in Fossil Species from Posterior Probability Densities

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Oct 26
PMID 34697239
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accurate characterization of sexual dimorphism is crucial in evolutionary biology because of its significance in understanding present and past adaptations involving reproductive and resource use strategies of species. However, inferring dimorphism in fossil assemblages is difficult, particularly with relatively low dimorphism. Commonly used methods of estimating dimorphism levels in fossils include the mean method, the binomial dimorphism index, and the coefficient of variation method. These methods have been reported to overestimate low levels of dimorphism, which is problematic when investigating issues such as canine size dimorphism in primates and its relation to reproductive strategies. Here, we introduce the posterior density peak (pdPeak) method that utilizes the Bayesian inference to provide posterior probability densities of dimorphism levels and within-sex variance. The highest posterior density point is termed the pdPeak. We investigated performance of the pdPeak method and made comparisons with the above-mentioned conventional methods via 1) computer-generated samples simulating a range of conditions and 2) application to canine crown-diameter datasets of extant known-sex anthropoids. Results showed that the pdPeak method is capable of unbiased estimates in a broader range of dimorphism levels than the other methods and uniquely provides reliable interval estimates. Although attention is required to its underestimation tendency when some of the distributional assumptions are violated, we demonstrate that the pdPeak method enables a more accurate dimorphism estimate at lower dimorphism levels than previously possible, which is important to illuminating human evolution.

Citing Articles

Convergent rates of protein evolution identify novel targets of sexual selection in primates.

Ports B, Jensen-Seaman M Evolution. 2023; 78(2):364-377.

PMID: 37864838 PMC: 10834059. DOI: 10.1093/evolut/qpad188.


Canine sexual dimorphism in was nearly human-like.

Suwa G, Sasaki T, Semaw S, Rogers M, Simpson S, Kunimatsu Y Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(49).

PMID: 34853174 PMC: 8670482. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2116630118.

References
1.
Fleagle J, Kay R, Simons E . Sexual dimorphism in early anthropoids. Nature. 1980; 287(5780):328-30. DOI: 10.1038/287328a0. View

2.
Semaw S, Simpson S, Quade J, Renne P, Butler R, McIntosh W . Early Pliocene hominids from Gona, Ethiopia. Nature. 2005; 433(7023):301-5. DOI: 10.1038/nature03177. View

3.
Godfrey L, Lyon S, Sutherland M . Sexual dimorphism in large-bodied primates: the case of the subfossil lemurs. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1993; 90(3):315-34. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330900306. View

4.
Suwa G, Kono R, Simpson S, Asfaw B, Lovejoy C, White T . Paleobiological implications of the Ardipithecus ramidus dentition. Science. 2009; 326(5949):94-9. View

5.
Kay R . Sexual dimorphism in Ramapithecinae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982; 79(2):209-12. PMC: 345695. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.2.209. View